Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Journal Articles > The Window of Vulnerability That Wasn’t: Soviet Military Buildup in the 1970s—A Research Note

EmailEmail   PrintPrint  

 
"The Window of Vulnerability That Wasn’t: Soviet Military Buildup in the 1970s—A Research Note"

"The Window of Vulnerability That Wasn’t: Soviet Military Buildup in the 1970s—A Research Note"

Journal Article, International Security, volume 33, issue 1, pages 118-138

Summer 2008

Author: Pavel Podvig

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: Quarterly Journal: International Security

 

SUMMARY

The Soviet strategic modernization program of the 1970s was one of the most consequential developments of the Cold War. Deployment of new intercontinental ballistic missiles and the dramatic increase in the number of strategic warheads in the Soviet arsenal created a sense of vulnerability in the United States that was, to a large degree, responsible for the U.S. military buildup of the late 1970s and early 1980s and the escalation of Cold War tensions during that period. U.S. assessments concluded that the Soviet Union was seeking to achieve a capability to fight and win a nuclear war. Estimates of missile accuracy and silo hardness provided by the U.S. intelligence community led many in the United States to conclude that the Soviet Union was building a strategic missile force capable of destroying most U.S. missiles in a counterforce strike and of surviving a subsequent nuclear exchange. Soviet archival documents that have recently become available demonstrate that this conclusion was wrong. The U.S. estimates substantially overestimated the accuracy of the Soviet Union’s missiles and the degree of silo reinforcement. As the data demonstrate, the Soviet missile force did not have the capability to launch a successful first strike. Moreover, the data strongly suggest that the Soviet Union never attempted to acquire a first-strike capability, concentrating instead on strategies based on retaliation.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the IS Editorial Assistant at 617-495-1914.

For Academic Citation:
Pavel Podvig. "The Window of Vulnerability That Wasn’t: Soviet Military Buildup in the 1970s—A Research Note." International Security 33 1 (Summer 2008): 118-138.

Ban Their Bomb
By Graham Allison

Preventive Defense: A New Security Strategy for America
By Dr. Ashton B. Carter and Dr. William J. Perry

Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger
By Dr. Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch and Philip D. Zelikow

Securing the Bomb 2008
By Matthew Bunn

<em>International Security</em>

The Fall 2008 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available. It includes articles by Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni and Calvert Jones, Sumit Ganguly, S. Paul Kapur, and more.

<em>International Security</em>

The Fall 2008 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available. It includes articles by Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni and Calvert Jones, Sumit Ganguly, S. Paul Kapur, and more.

EMAIL UPDATES

Get the latest research on the most important international topics

Sign up to receive updates of the Belfer Center's work on international security, climate change, nuclear issues, the Middle East, or more. Select the topics of your choice.

Human Rights and Wrongs: Slavery, Terror, Genocide

Human Rights and Wrongs explains the persistence of crimes against humanity since the Holocaust...

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past speakers include: Secretary of Energy Sam Bodman, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and Abdullah S. Jum'ah, president of Saudi Aramco.

Worst of the Worst: Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations

"This volume makes an unparalleled contribution to the growing and vital field of measurement and human rights. [The book] offers a useful categorization and assessment of repressive and 'rogue' states, allowing us to measure the extenet of repressive state behavior more accurately. His [Rotberg] work should embolden external critiques and facilitate more transparent and accountable foreign policy."

--Sarah Sewall, Director, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard University