Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center Newsletter
-PDP Workshop Explores Strategies for U.S.–North Korea Policy
Preventive Defense Project (PDP) Codirectors Ashton Carter and WilliamPerry hosted a workshop in Washington D.C. in July to design a coherent strategy for dealing with North Korea's nuclear weapons program. More than 50 experts took part in the workshop at the Center for Strategic and International Studies to explore the diplomatic option and coercive policies if diplomacy should fail.
The diplomatic option (Plan A) could include economic assistance and other incentives that the United States and its allies might offer in exchange for complete, verifiable, irreversible disarmament. Coercive policies (Plan B) might include economic sanctions, deterrence and containment, limited military strikes, and invasion with the goal of regime change.
The discussion highlighted critical areas of disagreement, including the desired "end state" of U.S. policy towards North Korea, the respective roles of diplomacy and coercive actions in achieving that end state, and the level of risk the United States should be willing to undertake in crafting and implementing a viable Plan B. The participants broadly agreed that there is essentially no realistic unilateral military option and that any strategy must be long-term in its focus and acceptable to key Asian allies, especially South Korea.
Gretchen Bartlett is Preventive Defense Project associate director.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Bartlett, Gretchen M.. “PDP Workshop Explores Strategies for U.S.–North Korea Policy.” Belfer Center Newsletter (Fall 2005).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
Is Nuclear Proliferation Back?
Journal Article
- H-Diplo | Robert Jervis International Security Studies Forum
Miller on Trachtenberg and Jervis on SALT
Journal Article
- International Security
The Dynamics of an Entangled Security Dilemma: China’s Changing Nuclear Posture
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Preventive Defense Project (PDP) Codirectors Ashton Carter and WilliamPerry hosted a workshop in Washington D.C. in July to design a coherent strategy for dealing with North Korea's nuclear weapons program. More than 50 experts took part in the workshop at the Center for Strategic and International Studies to explore the diplomatic option and coercive policies if diplomacy should fail.
The diplomatic option (Plan A) could include economic assistance and other incentives that the United States and its allies might offer in exchange for complete, verifiable, irreversible disarmament. Coercive policies (Plan B) might include economic sanctions, deterrence and containment, limited military strikes, and invasion with the goal of regime change.
The discussion highlighted critical areas of disagreement, including the desired "end state" of U.S. policy towards North Korea, the respective roles of diplomacy and coercive actions in achieving that end state, and the level of risk the United States should be willing to undertake in crafting and implementing a viable Plan B. The participants broadly agreed that there is essentially no realistic unilateral military option and that any strategy must be long-term in its focus and acceptable to key Asian allies, especially South Korea.
Gretchen Bartlett is Preventive Defense Project associate director.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Is Nuclear Proliferation Back?
Journal Article - H-Diplo | Robert Jervis International Security Studies Forum
Miller on Trachtenberg and Jervis on SALT
Journal Article - International Security
The Dynamics of an Entangled Security Dilemma: China’s Changing Nuclear Posture
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?