Analysis & Opinions - Financial Times
America Must Leave the Defeat of ISIS to Local States
Can the US "degrade and ultimately destroy" the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or Isis, as President Barack Obama promised on Wednesday, without being drawn into another open-ended conflict?
Not if America intends, as Joe Biden, the vice-president, put it last week, to follow Isis "to the gates of hell". That open-ended commitment takes pressure off states in the region to solve their own problems, and acting upon it would be a strategic mistake. Americans are anyway unlikely to accept the cost in blood and treasure. That should primarily be borne by the regional states whose broken politics brought Isis into being, and which have the most to lose....
Continue reading: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/4c28d686-39aa-11e4-83c4-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3D23c9Dnv
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Simpson, Emile.“America Must Leave the Defeat of ISIS to Local States.” Financial Times, September 11, 2014.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- International Security
Foreign Intervention and Internal Displacement: Urban Politics in Postwar Beirut
Journal Article
- International Security
Reining in Rebellion: The Decline of Political Violence in South America, 1830–1929
Journal Article
- International Security
Correspondence: Debating U.S. Security Assistance
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
America Fueled the Fire in the Middle East
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Can the US "degrade and ultimately destroy" the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or Isis, as President Barack Obama promised on Wednesday, without being drawn into another open-ended conflict?
Not if America intends, as Joe Biden, the vice-president, put it last week, to follow Isis "to the gates of hell". That open-ended commitment takes pressure off states in the region to solve their own problems, and acting upon it would be a strategic mistake. Americans are anyway unlikely to accept the cost in blood and treasure. That should primarily be borne by the regional states whose broken politics brought Isis into being, and which have the most to lose....
Continue reading: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/4c28d686-39aa-11e4-83c4-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3D23c9Dnv
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - International Security
Foreign Intervention and Internal Displacement: Urban Politics in Postwar Beirut
Journal Article - International Security
Reining in Rebellion: The Decline of Political Violence in South America, 1830–1929
Journal Article - International Security
Correspondence: Debating U.S. Security Assistance
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
America Fueled the Fire in the Middle East
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War