Paper - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Assessing Future Water Availability in Arid Regions Using Composition and Salience of Decision Criteria
ESD Working Paper Series
Note
Paper submitted for CESUN 2014 — Fourth International Engineering Systems Symposium to be held June 8–11, 2014 at Stevens Institute of Technology.
ABSTRACT
Water resources development options are usually selected on a least-cost basis. While economic considerations are dominant in choosing projects, there are also a mix of other factors including social demands, political expediency, social equity, and environmental considerations that impact final decisions and development of water supply systems. Understanding local priorities in water resource management decisions can allow for forming expectations of future regional water availability. In this research, we propose that future water availability in arid regions may be assessed by considering key projects that have been identified or planned by regional experts. Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis methods as a framework to organize set of decision criteria and their relative salience, the likelihood of selection (and development) of a project can be determined and used to form expectations of future regional water availability. We use this approach in a case study for Jordan, and find that large-scale desalination projects — that have been in the planning books for decades — are now most likely to be pursued and implemented in the country. Finally, we discuss strengths, limitations, and the general applicability of this method for assessing future water availability in other arid regions.
Download the entire working paper here: http://esd.mit.edu/WPS/2014/esd-wp-2014-10.pdf
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Energy Technology Innovation Policy
For Academic Citation:
Siddiqi, Afreen, Farah Ereiqat, and Laura Diaz Anadon. “Assessing Future Water Availability in Arid Regions Using Composition and Salience of Decision Criteria.” Paper, 2014-10, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March 2014.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Beyond the Headlines: A Kaleidoscopic Exploration of Contemporary African Politics and International Cooperation
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Transboundary Arctic Issues at Stake
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Should the West Engage with Russia on Science and Conversation While the War in Ukraine Continues?
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Press Release
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Barham A. Salih Joins Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Middle East Initiative at Harvard Kennedy School as Senior Fellow
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Analysis & Opinions
- Harvard Business Review
Intelligence Vendor Checklist
Note
Paper submitted for CESUN 2014 — Fourth International Engineering Systems Symposium to be held June 8–11, 2014 at Stevens Institute of Technology.
ABSTRACT
Water resources development options are usually selected on a least-cost basis. While economic considerations are dominant in choosing projects, there are also a mix of other factors including social demands, political expediency, social equity, and environmental considerations that impact final decisions and development of water supply systems. Understanding local priorities in water resource management decisions can allow for forming expectations of future regional water availability. In this research, we propose that future water availability in arid regions may be assessed by considering key projects that have been identified or planned by regional experts. Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis methods as a framework to organize set of decision criteria and their relative salience, the likelihood of selection (and development) of a project can be determined and used to form expectations of future regional water availability. We use this approach in a case study for Jordan, and find that large-scale desalination projects — that have been in the planning books for decades — are now most likely to be pursued and implemented in the country. Finally, we discuss strengths, limitations, and the general applicability of this method for assessing future water availability in other arid regions.
Download the entire working paper here: http://esd.mit.edu/WPS/2014/esd-wp-2014-10.pdf
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Beyond the Headlines: A Kaleidoscopic Exploration of Contemporary African Politics and International Cooperation
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Transboundary Arctic Issues at Stake
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Should the West Engage with Russia on Science and Conversation While the War in Ukraine Continues?
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Press Release - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Barham A. Salih Joins Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Middle East Initiative at Harvard Kennedy School as Senior Fellow
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Analysis & Opinions - Harvard Business Review
Intelligence Vendor Checklist