Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Dead Center: The Demise of Liberal Internationalism in the United States
Summary
According to mainstream opinion, the George W. Bush administration’s assertive unilateralism represents a temporary departure from the traditional foreign policy of the United States, one that will be rectified by a change of personnel in the White House in 2009. This interpretation of recent trends in U.S. policy is illusory. The Bush administration’s foreign policy, far from representing an aberration, marks the end of an era; it is a symptom, as much as a cause, of the unraveling of the liberal internationalist compact that guided the United States for more than half a century. The geopolitical and domestic conditions that gave rise to liberal internationalism have disappeared, eroding its bipartisan political foundations. In today’s partisan landscape, the challenge is devising a grand strategy that not only meets the country’s geopolitical needs but also is politically sustainable. A strategy that is as judicious and selective as it is purposeful offers the best hope for moving the United States toward a more stable and solvent political equilibrium.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Charles A. Kupchan and Peter L. Trubowitz. “Dead Center: The Demise of Liberal Internationalism in the United States.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 32. no. 2. (Fall 2007): 7-44 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
America Fueled the Fire in the Middle East
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
Journal Article
- Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs
The "Age of Normalizations"— An Overdue Post-Mortem
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
National Cyber Power Index 2022
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Summary
According to mainstream opinion, the George W. Bush administration’s assertive unilateralism represents a temporary departure from the traditional foreign policy of the United States, one that will be rectified by a change of personnel in the White House in 2009. This interpretation of recent trends in U.S. policy is illusory. The Bush administration’s foreign policy, far from representing an aberration, marks the end of an era; it is a symptom, as much as a cause, of the unraveling of the liberal internationalist compact that guided the United States for more than half a century. The geopolitical and domestic conditions that gave rise to liberal internationalism have disappeared, eroding its bipartisan political foundations. In today’s partisan landscape, the challenge is devising a grand strategy that not only meets the country’s geopolitical needs but also is politically sustainable. A strategy that is as judicious and selective as it is purposeful offers the best hope for moving the United States toward a more stable and solvent political equilibrium.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
America Fueled the Fire in the Middle East
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
Journal Article - Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs
The "Age of Normalizations"— An Overdue Post-Mortem
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
National Cyber Power Index 2022
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War