Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq
Summary
Since the Vietnam War, U.S. policymakers have worried that the American public will support military operations only if the human costs of the war, as measured in combat casualties, are minimal. Although the public is rightly averse to suffering casualties, the level of popular sensitivity to U.S. military casualties depends critically on the context in which those losses occur. The public’s tolerance for the human costs of war is primarily shaped by the intersection of two crucial factors: beliefs about the rightness or wrongness of the war, and beliefs about the war’s likely success. The impact of each belief depends upon the other. Ultimately, however, beliefs about the likelihood of success matter most in determining the public’s willingness to tolerate U.S. military deaths in combat. A reanalysis of publicly available polls and a detailed analysis of a series of polls designed by the authors to tap into public attitudes on casualties support this conclusion.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Gelpi, Christopher, Peter D. Feaver, and Jason Riefler. “Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 30. no. 3. (Winter 2005/06): 7-46 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
Analysis & Opinions
- The Atlantic
The Government Isn't Ready for the Violence Trump Might Unleash
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Nobody Actually Knows What Russia Does Next
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
National Cyber Power Index 2022
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Summary
Since the Vietnam War, U.S. policymakers have worried that the American public will support military operations only if the human costs of the war, as measured in combat casualties, are minimal. Although the public is rightly averse to suffering casualties, the level of popular sensitivity to U.S. military casualties depends critically on the context in which those losses occur. The public’s tolerance for the human costs of war is primarily shaped by the intersection of two crucial factors: beliefs about the rightness or wrongness of the war, and beliefs about the war’s likely success. The impact of each belief depends upon the other. Ultimately, however, beliefs about the likelihood of success matter most in determining the public’s willingness to tolerate U.S. military deaths in combat. A reanalysis of publicly available polls and a detailed analysis of a series of polls designed by the authors to tap into public attitudes on casualties support this conclusion.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
Analysis & Opinions - The Atlantic
The Government Isn't Ready for the Violence Trump Might Unleash
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Nobody Actually Knows What Russia Does Next
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
National Cyber Power Index 2022
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War