Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War
Overview
Are mature democracies better at making foreign policy than other kinds of regimes? Do their robust civic institutions and a flourishing marketplace of ideas reduce the likelihood of inflated threat assessments and “myths of empire” that can lead to risky foreign policies and, in some cases, war? To answer these questions, Chaim Kaufmann of Lehigh University examines the 2002–03 U.S. debate over going to war against Iraq. Kaufmann concludes that the democratic marketplace of ideas failed to challenge President George W. Bush’s case for toppling Saddam Hussein—despite the existence at the time of information that exposed the speciousness of many of the claims of the president’s foreign policy team. Kaufmann traces this failure to the Bush administration’s successful efforts to withhold or manipulate information that would have substantially weakened their argument for invading Iraq. He considers the implications of this strategy for U.S. foreign policy given the administration’s preventive war doctrine.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Kaufmann, Chaim. “Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 29. no. 1. (Summer 2004): 5-48 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- International Security
A “Nuclear Umbrella” for Ukraine? Precedents and Possibilities for Postwar European Security
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Why the U.S. Should Not Ban TikTok
Speech
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine and Its Impact on the Global Nuclear Order
Overview
Are mature democracies better at making foreign policy than other kinds of regimes? Do their robust civic institutions and a flourishing marketplace of ideas reduce the likelihood of inflated threat assessments and “myths of empire” that can lead to risky foreign policies and, in some cases, war? To answer these questions, Chaim Kaufmann of Lehigh University examines the 2002–03 U.S. debate over going to war against Iraq. Kaufmann concludes that the democratic marketplace of ideas failed to challenge President George W. Bush’s case for toppling Saddam Hussein—despite the existence at the time of information that exposed the speciousness of many of the claims of the president’s foreign policy team. Kaufmann traces this failure to the Bush administration’s successful efforts to withhold or manipulate information that would have substantially weakened their argument for invading Iraq. He considers the implications of this strategy for U.S. foreign policy given the administration’s preventive war doctrine.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - International Security
A “Nuclear Umbrella” for Ukraine? Precedents and Possibilities for Postwar European Security
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Why the U.S. Should Not Ban TikTok
Speech - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine and Its Impact on the Global Nuclear Order