Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
What’s in a Line? Is Partition a Solution to Civil War?
Does territorial partition of countries in civil wars help to end these wars, reducing the risk of recurrence? Researchers have proposed territorial partition with or without formal recognition of sovereignty as a solution to civil wars and a way to create self-enforcing peace. Quantitative studies of the effect of partition on the risk of renewed civil war, however, suffer several main shortcomings, including conflicting results in the extant literature that result mainly from data coding differences, selective use of case histories, and methodological problems. A new data set and a benchmark empirical analysis find that, on average, partition is unlikely to reduce the risk of a return to civil war and, in some cases, may increase that risk.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Nicholas Sambanis and Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl. “What’s in a Line? Is Partition a Solution to Civil War?.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 34. no. 2. (Fall 2009): 82-118 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- International Security
Foreign Intervention and Internal Displacement: Urban Politics in Postwar Beirut
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
5 Reasons the Israel-Palestine Conflict Won't End Any Time Soon
Magazine Article
- History Today
An Uyghur Chieftain in China's Civil War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea: A Practical Guide
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
Does territorial partition of countries in civil wars help to end these wars, reducing the risk of recurrence? Researchers have proposed territorial partition with or without formal recognition of sovereignty as a solution to civil wars and a way to create self-enforcing peace. Quantitative studies of the effect of partition on the risk of renewed civil war, however, suffer several main shortcomings, including conflicting results in the extant literature that result mainly from data coding differences, selective use of case histories, and methodological problems. A new data set and a benchmark empirical analysis find that, on average, partition is unlikely to reduce the risk of a return to civil war and, in some cases, may increase that risk.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - International Security
Foreign Intervention and Internal Displacement: Urban Politics in Postwar Beirut
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
5 Reasons the Israel-Palestine Conflict Won't End Any Time Soon
Magazine Article - History Today
An Uyghur Chieftain in China's Civil War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea: A Practical Guide
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests