Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
When Good Fences Make Bad Neighbors: Fixed Borders, State Weakness, and International Conflict
Abstract
Since the end of World War II, the norm of fixed borders—the proscription against foreign conquest and annexation of homeland territory—has gained prevalence in world politics. Although the norm seeks to make the world a more peaceful place, it may instead cause it to become more conflict prone. Among sociopolitically weak states—states that lack legitimate and effective governmental institutions—fixed borders can actually increase instability and conflict. Adherence to the norm of fixed borders can lead to the perpetuation and exacerbation of weakness in states that are already weak or that have just gained independence. It does so by depriving states of what was traditionally the most potent incentive to increase efforts of state building: territorial pressures. By creating conditions that are rife for the spillover of civil wars and by supplying opportunities for foreign predation, sociopolitically weak states in a world of fixed borders have become a major source of interstate conflict in much of the developing world. Investigation into one case, the war in Congo, reveals the plausibility and the potential force of this argument. Good fences indeed can make bad neighbors.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Atzili, Boaz. “When Good Fences Make Bad Neighbors: Fixed Borders, State Weakness, and International Conflict.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 31. no. 3. (Winter 2006/07): 139-173 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- International Security
Foreign Intervention and Internal Displacement: Urban Politics in Postwar Beirut
Journal Article
- International Security
Reining in Rebellion: The Decline of Political Violence in South America, 1830–1929
Journal Article
- International Security
Correspondence: Debating U.S. Security Assistance
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Why the U.S. Should Not Ban TikTok
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Abstract
Since the end of World War II, the norm of fixed borders—the proscription against foreign conquest and annexation of homeland territory—has gained prevalence in world politics. Although the norm seeks to make the world a more peaceful place, it may instead cause it to become more conflict prone. Among sociopolitically weak states—states that lack legitimate and effective governmental institutions—fixed borders can actually increase instability and conflict. Adherence to the norm of fixed borders can lead to the perpetuation and exacerbation of weakness in states that are already weak or that have just gained independence. It does so by depriving states of what was traditionally the most potent incentive to increase efforts of state building: territorial pressures. By creating conditions that are rife for the spillover of civil wars and by supplying opportunities for foreign predation, sociopolitically weak states in a world of fixed borders have become a major source of interstate conflict in much of the developing world. Investigation into one case, the war in Congo, reveals the plausibility and the potential force of this argument. Good fences indeed can make bad neighbors.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - International Security
Foreign Intervention and Internal Displacement: Urban Politics in Postwar Beirut
Journal Article - International Security
Reining in Rebellion: The Decline of Political Violence in South America, 1830–1929
Journal Article - International Security
Correspondence: Debating U.S. Security Assistance
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Why the U.S. Should Not Ban TikTok
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It