Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Yes, Trump and Kim Can Make a Deal That's Good for Everyone
If both sides agree on the answers to these three questions, a successful summit just might be possible.
What's going to happen when U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un finally get together? I don't know, and neither does anyone else. My colleague Graham Allison thinks there’s a limited but mutually beneficial agreement to be had; other analysts are decidedly more pessimistic. The uncertainty surrounding the whole business is hardly surprising, given the two leaders involved and the improvised nature of the entire process. Normally you'd expect the two sides to have worked out the outlines of the agreement before the two heads of state sat down together, but that's unlikely to be the case this time — which means almost anything could happen....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Walt, Stephen M.“Yes, Trump and Kim Can Make a Deal That's Good for Everyone.” Foreign Policy, April 25, 2018.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- War on the Rocks
Denuclearization Again? Lessons from Ukraine's Decision to Disarm
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
America Can't Be Trusted Anymore
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Give North Korea All the Prestige It Wants
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership
What's going to happen when U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un finally get together? I don't know, and neither does anyone else. My colleague Graham Allison thinks there’s a limited but mutually beneficial agreement to be had; other analysts are decidedly more pessimistic. The uncertainty surrounding the whole business is hardly surprising, given the two leaders involved and the improvised nature of the entire process. Normally you'd expect the two sides to have worked out the outlines of the agreement before the two heads of state sat down together, but that's unlikely to be the case this time — which means almost anything could happen....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - War on the Rocks
Denuclearization Again? Lessons from Ukraine's Decision to Disarm
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
America Can't Be Trusted Anymore
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Give North Korea All the Prestige It Wants
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership


