Analysis & Opinions - The Conversation
The Madrid Climate Conference’s Real Failure was Not Getting a Broad Deal on Global Carbon Markets
Press accounts of the Madrid climate conference that adjourned on Dec. 15 are calling it a failure in the face of inspirational calls from youth activists and others for greater ambition. But based on my 25 years following and analyzing this process together with scholars and government officials from around the world, I believe the reality is more complicated.
True, this round of climate talks did not produce an aspirational statement calling for greater ambition in the next round of national pledges. In my view, that's not actually very significant in terms of its real effects, even though organizations such as Greenpeace and Extinction Rebellion framed this as the key task for this meeting.
On the other hand, the talks failed to reach one of their key stated goals: writing meaningful rules to help facilitate global carbon markets. As an economist, I see this as a real disappointment — although not the fatal failure some portray it to be....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via The Conversation.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
For Academic Citation:
Stavins, Robert N.“The Madrid Climate Conference’s Real Failure was Not Getting a Broad Deal on Global Carbon Markets.” The Conversation, December 18, 2019.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
News
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements Hosts COP25 Panel on Realizing the Potential of Article 6
News
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
HPCA Hosts COP25 Side Event Focused on Reducing GHG Emissions through Carbon Pricing
Audio
- Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Environmental Insights Interview with Andrei Marcu
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Press accounts of the Madrid climate conference that adjourned on Dec. 15 are calling it a failure in the face of inspirational calls from youth activists and others for greater ambition. But based on my 25 years following and analyzing this process together with scholars and government officials from around the world, I believe the reality is more complicated.
True, this round of climate talks did not produce an aspirational statement calling for greater ambition in the next round of national pledges. In my view, that's not actually very significant in terms of its real effects, even though organizations such as Greenpeace and Extinction Rebellion framed this as the key task for this meeting.
On the other hand, the talks failed to reach one of their key stated goals: writing meaningful rules to help facilitate global carbon markets. As an economist, I see this as a real disappointment — although not the fatal failure some portray it to be....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via The Conversation.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
News - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements Hosts COP25 Panel on Realizing the Potential of Article 6
News - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
HPCA Hosts COP25 Side Event Focused on Reducing GHG Emissions through Carbon Pricing
Audio - Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Environmental Insights Interview with Andrei Marcu
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


