Analysis & Opinions - USA Today
America Was the Keeper of Democracy. We Were Imperfect But We Kept Trying, Until Now.
I was privileged to be a diplomat for the United States in two administrations, traveling the world to protect and advance our interests. The moral authority of America, the beacon on the hill that President Ronald Reagan spoke of, was an essential part of that interest. America, under Democratic and Republican presidents, valued human rights abroad, even in acknowledging our deep imperfections of racism, sexism and economic discrimination. I was proud to represent my country and heard repeatedly from others that they would do their part to follow, but that America needed to lead. We were the keepers of democracy, the imperfect union that aspired to always being better and wanting others to do the same.
We did not always do our best. During the struggle of Muslims in Bosnia, despite bipartisan support by Sen. Bob Dole, R-Kan., and Sen. George Mitchell, D-Maine, we hesitated until our satellite uncovered a mass grave in Srebrenica, and then we knew what we must do. We hesitated in Rwanda and witnessed a genocide, when we should have more forcibly led an international response. And, in Syria, although we tried to mobilize the world and did remove declared chemical weapons, we nonetheless held back for an America exhausted of foreign wars.
But we have persisted in calling out human rights abuses, engaging with the world and the institutions of the world to be better; to fight for democratic values, to welcome people fleeing torture and death, to be a better America; to help ensure a better, more just world.
We have persisted — until now.
Morally leaderless and voiceless
Today, we are leaderless and voiceless from the White House, at home and abroad, even as the voices of our citizens in the street, here and abroad, are loud and strong.
Throughout the world this week, protesters are marching in London, Paris, Sydney, Tokyo and elsewhere in solidarity with Americans protesting George Floyd’s killing, police brutality and racial injustice. Voices from the pope to the prime minister of Canada challenged President Donald Trump and questioned whether the United States still possessed any moral authority.
In an irony of history, last week also saw remembrances of June 4, 1989, when a single man, so small in the face of an enormous tank, came to symbolize what became known as Tiananmen Square Massacre. In little more than 24 hours, hundreds if not thousands of Chinese citizens were murdered and thousands injured as Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping declared martial law and ordered a military mobilization to mow down peaceful protesters to reassert control.
Then-citizen Donald Trump praised China the following year for demonstrating the “power of strength" — foreshadowing his calls as president for military force to end violent protests, for governors to “dominate” and crush the call for justice, according to audio of the meeting obtained by CBS News. President Trump’s words and actions signaled a government more inclined to authoritarian leadership than to democracy.
– Via USA Today.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Sherman, Wendy.“America Was the Keeper of Democracy. We Were Imperfect But We Kept Trying, Until Now..” USA Today, June 10, 2020.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Network Connections and the Emergence of the Hub-and-Spokes Alliance System in East Asia
Analysis & Opinions
- The New York Times
U.S. Diplomats and Spies Battle Trump Administration Over Suspected Attacks
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
I was privileged to be a diplomat for the United States in two administrations, traveling the world to protect and advance our interests. The moral authority of America, the beacon on the hill that President Ronald Reagan spoke of, was an essential part of that interest. America, under Democratic and Republican presidents, valued human rights abroad, even in acknowledging our deep imperfections of racism, sexism and economic discrimination. I was proud to represent my country and heard repeatedly from others that they would do their part to follow, but that America needed to lead. We were the keepers of democracy, the imperfect union that aspired to always being better and wanting others to do the same.
We did not always do our best. During the struggle of Muslims in Bosnia, despite bipartisan support by Sen. Bob Dole, R-Kan., and Sen. George Mitchell, D-Maine, we hesitated until our satellite uncovered a mass grave in Srebrenica, and then we knew what we must do. We hesitated in Rwanda and witnessed a genocide, when we should have more forcibly led an international response. And, in Syria, although we tried to mobilize the world and did remove declared chemical weapons, we nonetheless held back for an America exhausted of foreign wars.
But we have persisted in calling out human rights abuses, engaging with the world and the institutions of the world to be better; to fight for democratic values, to welcome people fleeing torture and death, to be a better America; to help ensure a better, more just world.
We have persisted — until now.
Morally leaderless and voiceless
Today, we are leaderless and voiceless from the White House, at home and abroad, even as the voices of our citizens in the street, here and abroad, are loud and strong.
Throughout the world this week, protesters are marching in London, Paris, Sydney, Tokyo and elsewhere in solidarity with Americans protesting George Floyd’s killing, police brutality and racial injustice. Voices from the pope to the prime minister of Canada challenged President Donald Trump and questioned whether the United States still possessed any moral authority.
In an irony of history, last week also saw remembrances of June 4, 1989, when a single man, so small in the face of an enormous tank, came to symbolize what became known as Tiananmen Square Massacre. In little more than 24 hours, hundreds if not thousands of Chinese citizens were murdered and thousands injured as Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping declared martial law and ordered a military mobilization to mow down peaceful protesters to reassert control.
Then-citizen Donald Trump praised China the following year for demonstrating the “power of strength" — foreshadowing his calls as president for military force to end violent protests, for governors to “dominate” and crush the call for justice, according to audio of the meeting obtained by CBS News. President Trump’s words and actions signaled a government more inclined to authoritarian leadership than to democracy.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Network Connections and the Emergence of the Hub-and-Spokes Alliance System in East Asia
Analysis & Opinions - The New York Times
U.S. Diplomats and Spies Battle Trump Administration Over Suspected Attacks
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


