Report - Managing the Atom Project, Belfer Center
What Price Nuclear Governance? Funding the International Atomic Energy Agency
This report on the International Atomic Energy Agency proposes a grand bargain to address the organization’s longstanding funding challenges. What Price Nuclear Governance? Funding the IAEA, by MTA Associate Trevor Findlay, considers critical questions facing the IAEA’s budget and finance, and concludes that:
- funding is insufficient for the Agency to carry out its core functions
- increasing reliance on voluntary funding is problematic
- the budget negotiation process is not as effective or streamlined as it should be
- the current funding system is inequitable and inappropriate given changes in the nuclear industry since the IAEA was founded
Findlay recommends a number of steps to cut the Gordian knot between the funding of technical cooperation, nuclear safeguards, and nuclear security and break the impasse on IAEA funding, including:
- the shielding system for nuclear safeguards must be ended
- a Nuclear Emergency Fund and IAEA Endowment should be established to provide greater financial stability to the Agency
- the IAEA should seek alternative funding sources besides member states through a proper resource mobilization strategy.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Managing the Atom
For Academic Citation:
Findlay, Trevor. “What Price Nuclear Governance? Funding the International Atomic Energy Agency.” Managing the Atom Project, Belfer Center, March 24, 2016.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio
- Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Stopping Power of Norms: Saturation Bombing, Civilian Immunity, and U.S. Attitudes toward the Laws of War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
This report on the International Atomic Energy Agency proposes a grand bargain to address the organization’s longstanding funding challenges. What Price Nuclear Governance? Funding the IAEA, by MTA Associate Trevor Findlay, considers critical questions facing the IAEA’s budget and finance, and concludes that:
- funding is insufficient for the Agency to carry out its core functions
- increasing reliance on voluntary funding is problematic
- the budget negotiation process is not as effective or streamlined as it should be
- the current funding system is inequitable and inappropriate given changes in the nuclear industry since the IAEA was founded
Findlay recommends a number of steps to cut the Gordian knot between the funding of technical cooperation, nuclear safeguards, and nuclear security and break the impasse on IAEA funding, including:
- the shielding system for nuclear safeguards must be ended
- a Nuclear Emergency Fund and IAEA Endowment should be established to provide greater financial stability to the Agency
- the IAEA should seek alternative funding sources besides member states through a proper resource mobilization strategy.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio - Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Stopping Power of Norms: Saturation Bombing, Civilian Immunity, and U.S. Attitudes toward the Laws of War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


