Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Long-Term Ideal Versus Short-Term Reality
"Baldev Raj and P.R. Vasudeva Rao have argued that reprocessing and fast breeder reactors are necessary for the long-term sustainability of nuclear power. Indeed, fast breeder reactors' potential to produce more fuel than they consume has held an attraction since the advent of nuclear power, especially to those who envision a time when uranium will no longer be available cheaply. Unfortunately, several decades of experience have shown that plutonium recycling systems are much more costly and much less reliable than water-cooled reactors. If establishing sustainable nuclear power means successfully managing important issues such as nuclear safety and proliferation resistance, while also achieving economic competitiveness, minimizing production of radioactive waste, and using natural resources wisely, breeder reactors and plutonium recycling still have far to go before they can meaningfully contribute..."
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Managing the Atom
For Academic Citation:
Zhang, Hui.“Long-Term Ideal Versus Short-Term Reality.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May 6, 2015.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Bloomberg Opinion
After Oil: Throwing Money at Green Energy Isn’t Enough
Analysis & Opinions
- Bloomberg Opinion
Pandemic Is Hurting, Not Helping, Green Energy
Analysis & Opinions
- Bloomberg Opinion
After Oil: U.S.-China Split Will Hurt Clean Energy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
"Baldev Raj and P.R. Vasudeva Rao have argued that reprocessing and fast breeder reactors are necessary for the long-term sustainability of nuclear power. Indeed, fast breeder reactors' potential to produce more fuel than they consume has held an attraction since the advent of nuclear power, especially to those who envision a time when uranium will no longer be available cheaply. Unfortunately, several decades of experience have shown that plutonium recycling systems are much more costly and much less reliable than water-cooled reactors. If establishing sustainable nuclear power means successfully managing important issues such as nuclear safety and proliferation resistance, while also achieving economic competitiveness, minimizing production of radioactive waste, and using natural resources wisely, breeder reactors and plutonium recycling still have far to go before they can meaningfully contribute..."
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Bloomberg Opinion
After Oil: Throwing Money at Green Energy Isn’t Enough
Analysis & Opinions - Bloomberg Opinion
Pandemic Is Hurting, Not Helping, Green Energy
Analysis & Opinions - Bloomberg Opinion
After Oil: U.S.-China Split Will Hurt Clean Energy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


