Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Reprocessing in China: A Long, Risky Journey
"Since 1983, a closed fuel cycle has been an official element of China's nuclear energy policy. According to proponents, plutonium reprocessing and breeder reactors will allow full utilization of China’s uranium resources, drastically reduce the volume of radioactive waste that must be stored in an underground repository, and establish a way to dispense with the spent fuel accumulating in China’s reactor pools. But Beijing's attempts to develop commercially viable reprocessing facilities and breeder reactors have been afflicted with technological difficulties, serious delays, and cost overruns. At this point—especially taking into account China's ample uranium resources and its easy access to additional resources abroad—it appears very doubtful that reprocessing and fast reactors are the proper way forward for China's nuclear energy sector..."
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Managing the Atom
For Academic Citation:
Zhang, Hui.“Reprocessing in China: A Long, Risky Journey.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April 10, 2015.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Center Experts Reflect on 75th Anniversary of Hiroshima Bombing
Analysis & Opinions
- The Washington Post
75 Years after Hiroshima, Here are 4 Things to Know about Nuclear Disarmament Efforts
Journal Article
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
'What About China?' and the Threat to US–Russian Nuclear Arms Control
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
"Since 1983, a closed fuel cycle has been an official element of China's nuclear energy policy. According to proponents, plutonium reprocessing and breeder reactors will allow full utilization of China’s uranium resources, drastically reduce the volume of radioactive waste that must be stored in an underground repository, and establish a way to dispense with the spent fuel accumulating in China’s reactor pools. But Beijing's attempts to develop commercially viable reprocessing facilities and breeder reactors have been afflicted with technological difficulties, serious delays, and cost overruns. At this point—especially taking into account China's ample uranium resources and its easy access to additional resources abroad—it appears very doubtful that reprocessing and fast reactors are the proper way forward for China's nuclear energy sector..."
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Center Experts Reflect on 75th Anniversary of Hiroshima Bombing
Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
75 Years after Hiroshima, Here are 4 Things to Know about Nuclear Disarmament Efforts
Journal Article - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
'What About China?' and the Threat to US–Russian Nuclear Arms Control
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


