Analysis & Opinions - Task Force on Iran
Key Limitations on Iran’s Uranium Enrichment Program
In the preamble of the November 2013 Joint Plan of Action (JPOA), the P5+1concurred that a comprehensive agreement would involve an Iranian domestic enrichment capability. This concession, immediately pocketed by Tehran, marked a fundamental change in the negotiations. Instead of a complete suspension of enrichment and reprocessing activities, as called for in multiple Security Council resolutions and a foundational plank of all previous negotiating positions, the P5+1 negotiators are now attempting to reach a comprehensive agreement with Iran that will establish a credible “threshold time window,” or “breakout time,” which would provide sufficient time to detect breakout and give the international community adequate time to respond to Iranian violations.
The full text of the memo can be found below.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Heinonen, Olli.“Key Limitations on Iran’s Uranium Enrichment Program.” Task Force on Iran, October 2014.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Stopping Power of Norms: Saturation Bombing, Civilian Immunity, and U.S. Attitudes toward the Laws of War
Analysis & Opinions
- Quincy Institute For Responsible Statecraft
A US Nuclear Weapons Surge in 2021 Would Have No Strategic Value
Journal Article
- CSS Policy Perspectives
Arms Control: For and By Europe
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
In the preamble of the November 2013 Joint Plan of Action (JPOA), the P5+1concurred that a comprehensive agreement would involve an Iranian domestic enrichment capability. This concession, immediately pocketed by Tehran, marked a fundamental change in the negotiations. Instead of a complete suspension of enrichment and reprocessing activities, as called for in multiple Security Council resolutions and a foundational plank of all previous negotiating positions, the P5+1 negotiators are now attempting to reach a comprehensive agreement with Iran that will establish a credible “threshold time window,” or “breakout time,” which would provide sufficient time to detect breakout and give the international community adequate time to respond to Iranian violations.
The full text of the memo can be found below.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Stopping Power of Norms: Saturation Bombing, Civilian Immunity, and U.S. Attitudes toward the Laws of War
Analysis & Opinions - Quincy Institute For Responsible Statecraft
A US Nuclear Weapons Surge in 2021 Would Have No Strategic Value
Journal Article - CSS Policy Perspectives
Arms Control: For and By Europe
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


