Presentation
Nuclear Forensics and Its Role in Security Policy
International Security Program Seminar Series
Abstract
Nuclear forensic analysis is currently discussed as a potentially important new tool to prevent nuclear terrorism by enabling investigators to attribute nuclear materials to their production facility and thus deterring potential state actors from transferring such materials to terrorists. However, these high expectations, expressed by analysts and government officials, rely on scientific methods whose viability is often difficult to assess without access to classified data. Moreover, threatening nuclear retaliation against states which may support nuclear terrorists on the basis of nuclear attribution would be credible vis-à-vis only a few states. At the same time it may undermine the opportunity to strengthen existing threat-reduction programs with Russia and to explore ways for improved security cooperation with states such as Pakistan, China, and India.
In the seminar, an introduction into the technical possibilities and limitations of pre- and post-attack nuclear forensics was given, based entirely on open source analysis. This was followed by a discussion about the roles that nuclear attribution can — or cannot — play in security policy, from combating illicit trafficking to being a cornerstone for a new deterrence paradigm.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Bielefeld, Tom. “Nuclear Forensics and Its Role in Security Policy.” Presentation, November 20, 2008.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Russia Matters
Lessons for Leaders: What Afghanistan Taught Russian and Soviet Strategists
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Revitalizing Nuclear Security in an Era of Uncertainty
Analysis & Opinions
- The Hill
Rhetoric Aside, the US Commitment to Preventing Nuclear Terrorism is Waning
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
Nuclear forensic analysis is currently discussed as a potentially important new tool to prevent nuclear terrorism by enabling investigators to attribute nuclear materials to their production facility and thus deterring potential state actors from transferring such materials to terrorists. However, these high expectations, expressed by analysts and government officials, rely on scientific methods whose viability is often difficult to assess without access to classified data. Moreover, threatening nuclear retaliation against states which may support nuclear terrorists on the basis of nuclear attribution would be credible vis-à-vis only a few states. At the same time it may undermine the opportunity to strengthen existing threat-reduction programs with Russia and to explore ways for improved security cooperation with states such as Pakistan, China, and India.
In the seminar, an introduction into the technical possibilities and limitations of pre- and post-attack nuclear forensics was given, based entirely on open source analysis. This was followed by a discussion about the roles that nuclear attribution can — or cannot — play in security policy, from combating illicit trafficking to being a cornerstone for a new deterrence paradigm.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Russia Matters
Lessons for Leaders: What Afghanistan Taught Russian and Soviet Strategists
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Revitalizing Nuclear Security in an Era of Uncertainty
Analysis & Opinions - The Hill
Rhetoric Aside, the US Commitment to Preventing Nuclear Terrorism is Waning
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


