Journal Article - International Security
Nuclear Stability in South Asia
Abstract
An examination of the onset, evolution, and termination of the 1999 and 2001–02 crises between India and Pakistan suggests that nuclear deterrence is robust in South Asia. Even though the 1999 crisis erupted into a war, its scope and dimensions were carefully circumscribed. Despite its conventional capabilities, India chose not to cross the Line of Control (the de facto international border in the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir), and it avoided horizontal escalation of the conflict. India’s restraint cannot be attributed either to timely U.S. intervention or to a concern about avoiding a bellicose international image. Instead a highly jingoistic regime, which had defied international public opinion the previous year through a series of nuclear tests, chose to exercise restraint because of Pakistan’s possession of nuclear weapons. In 2001, despite grave Pakistani provocation through a series of terrorist attacks, India could only respond with a strategy of coercive diplomacy.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Sumit Ganguly. “Nuclear Stability in South Asia.” International Security, vol. 33. no. 2. (Fall 2008): 45-70 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report
- Managing the Atom Project, Belfer Center
The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
India's New Nuclear Thinking: Counterforce, Crises, and Consequences
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Proliferation and the Logic of the Nuclear Market
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
An examination of the onset, evolution, and termination of the 1999 and 2001–02 crises between India and Pakistan suggests that nuclear deterrence is robust in South Asia. Even though the 1999 crisis erupted into a war, its scope and dimensions were carefully circumscribed. Despite its conventional capabilities, India chose not to cross the Line of Control (the de facto international border in the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir), and it avoided horizontal escalation of the conflict. India’s restraint cannot be attributed either to timely U.S. intervention or to a concern about avoiding a bellicose international image. Instead a highly jingoistic regime, which had defied international public opinion the previous year through a series of nuclear tests, chose to exercise restraint because of Pakistan’s possession of nuclear weapons. In 2001, despite grave Pakistani provocation through a series of terrorist attacks, India could only respond with a strategy of coercive diplomacy.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report - Managing the Atom Project, Belfer Center
The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
India's New Nuclear Thinking: Counterforce, Crises, and Consequences
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Proliferation and the Logic of the Nuclear Market
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


