Journal Article - Carbon and Climate Law Review
Corporate Policy Preferences in the EU and the US: Emissions Trading as the Climate Compromise?
Abstract
Since the agreement of the Kyoto Protocol, business in the EU and the US has been split over the course of climate policy. Companies in Europe largely accepted mandatory emission controls. Companies in the US, instead, promoted voluntary commitments. However, in early 2007 the CEOs of major US corporations and the heads of a number of leading environmental groups called for the creation of a domestic cap-and-trade scheme. The launch of the US Climate Action Partnership has been widely perceived as a sea change in the positioning of corporate America on climate change. This article reviews the regulatory preferences of major business associations on both sides of the Atlantic. This serves to assess whether the transatlantic gap on corporate positioning on climate change is actually narrowing and what the compromise solution might be.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Energy Technology Innovation Policy
For Academic Citation:
Meckling, Jonas. “Corporate Policy Preferences in the EU and the US: Emissions Trading as the Climate Compromise?.” Carbon and Climate Law Review, no. 2/2008. (2008) .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Policy Brief
The Future of Carbon Offset Markets
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Newspaper Article
- Harvard Crimson
HKS Prof. Aldy Talks Clean Energy, Economic Policy at Belfer Center Webinar
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
Since the agreement of the Kyoto Protocol, business in the EU and the US has been split over the course of climate policy. Companies in Europe largely accepted mandatory emission controls. Companies in the US, instead, promoted voluntary commitments. However, in early 2007 the CEOs of major US corporations and the heads of a number of leading environmental groups called for the creation of a domestic cap-and-trade scheme. The launch of the US Climate Action Partnership has been widely perceived as a sea change in the positioning of corporate America on climate change. This article reviews the regulatory preferences of major business associations on both sides of the Atlantic. This serves to assess whether the transatlantic gap on corporate positioning on climate change is actually narrowing and what the compromise solution might be.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Policy Brief
The Future of Carbon Offset Markets
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Newspaper Article - Harvard Crimson
HKS Prof. Aldy Talks Clean Energy, Economic Policy at Belfer Center Webinar
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy

