Journal Article - The Journal of Energy and Development
Are Light Water Reactor Energy Systems Sustainable?
This paper discusses the concept "intermediate sustainability," in which there is some substitution between natural and technical capital over the foreseeable future. We suggest criteria by which to judge the intermediate sustainability of nuclear energy, in particular the LWR energy system. We conclude that LWR technology does not violate intermediate sustainability criteria for environmental emissions (including LWR plant health and safety) or accidental radioactive release. However, one could argue that LWR energy systems do not satisfy all of the intermediate sustainability criteria because of (1) their use of a depletable resource, uranium, and (2) the existence of externalities associated with the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Also, we conclude that the LWR industry is not economically sustainable unless the cost of new LWR capacity is greatly reduced. Therefore, we suggest new nuclear power research to focus on proliferation-resistant technologies with (1) lower costs of construction and (2) increased fuel efficiency in the longer run.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Energy Technology Innovation Policy
For Academic Citation:
Rothwell, Geoffrey and Bob van der Zwaan. “Are Light Water Reactor Energy Systems Sustainable?.” The Journal of Energy and Development, vol. 29. no. 1. (Autumn 2003): 65-79 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Policy Brief
The Future of Carbon Offset Markets
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Newspaper Article
- Harvard Crimson
HKS Prof. Aldy Talks Clean Energy, Economic Policy at Belfer Center Webinar
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
This paper discusses the concept "intermediate sustainability," in which there is some substitution between natural and technical capital over the foreseeable future. We suggest criteria by which to judge the intermediate sustainability of nuclear energy, in particular the LWR energy system. We conclude that LWR technology does not violate intermediate sustainability criteria for environmental emissions (including LWR plant health and safety) or accidental radioactive release. However, one could argue that LWR energy systems do not satisfy all of the intermediate sustainability criteria because of (1) their use of a depletable resource, uranium, and (2) the existence of externalities associated with the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Also, we conclude that the LWR industry is not economically sustainable unless the cost of new LWR capacity is greatly reduced. Therefore, we suggest new nuclear power research to focus on proliferation-resistant technologies with (1) lower costs of construction and (2) increased fuel efficiency in the longer run.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Policy Brief
The Future of Carbon Offset Markets
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Newspaper Article - Harvard Crimson
HKS Prof. Aldy Talks Clean Energy, Economic Policy at Belfer Center Webinar
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy

