Journal Article - Climate Change
Wealth, Responsibility, and Equity: Exploring an Allocation Framework for Global GHG Emissions
Abstract
The need to develop a framework for allocating national GHG emissions based on ‘rights to the atmosphere’ is increasingly pressing since a resolution of the issues surrounding these rights are likely to be a precondition not only for moving beyond the Kyoto Protocol, but even for effective implementation of its Articles. This paper explores some possible variations of a framework that is derived from the principles of the Climate Convention. It takes into account differences among countries in terms of their current and historical greenhouse gas emissions, the attributes that contribute to these differences, and the capabilities for contributing to the achievement of the Convention’s objectives. Furthermore, it is suggested that such a framework should be designed so as to decouple the allocation issue from the deliberations over a suitable GHG concentration stabilization target or global emissions cap. Such an approach could help achieve results in the short to mid-term without waiting for resolution of the complex debate on the desirable level of stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.
Sample explorations with carbon dioxide emissions data indicate that the framework presented here can be particularly favorable to the least-developed countries. This is appropriate since these countries have not contributed substantially to the enhanced greenhouse effect, but may be quite vulnerable to the impacts of a changing climate, and lack the capabilities to mitigate adverse impacts or adapt as needed. Equally importantly, the framework also differentiates between industrialized countries on the basis of their current income and historical emissions. The implementation of such a framework in conjunction with an emissions trading scheme may offer an appropriate path towards meeting the objectives of the Climate Convention.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Sagar, Ambuj. “Wealth, Responsibility, and Equity: Exploring an Allocation Framework for Global GHG Emissions.” Climate Change, vol. 45. no. 3/4. (May 31, 2000): 511-527 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio
- Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Analysis & Opinions
- The New York Times
U.S. Diplomats and Spies Battle Trump Administration Over Suspected Attacks
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
The need to develop a framework for allocating national GHG emissions based on ‘rights to the atmosphere’ is increasingly pressing since a resolution of the issues surrounding these rights are likely to be a precondition not only for moving beyond the Kyoto Protocol, but even for effective implementation of its Articles. This paper explores some possible variations of a framework that is derived from the principles of the Climate Convention. It takes into account differences among countries in terms of their current and historical greenhouse gas emissions, the attributes that contribute to these differences, and the capabilities for contributing to the achievement of the Convention’s objectives. Furthermore, it is suggested that such a framework should be designed so as to decouple the allocation issue from the deliberations over a suitable GHG concentration stabilization target or global emissions cap. Such an approach could help achieve results in the short to mid-term without waiting for resolution of the complex debate on the desirable level of stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.
Sample explorations with carbon dioxide emissions data indicate that the framework presented here can be particularly favorable to the least-developed countries. This is appropriate since these countries have not contributed substantially to the enhanced greenhouse effect, but may be quite vulnerable to the impacts of a changing climate, and lack the capabilities to mitigate adverse impacts or adapt as needed. Equally importantly, the framework also differentiates between industrialized countries on the basis of their current income and historical emissions. The implementation of such a framework in conjunction with an emissions trading scheme may offer an appropriate path towards meeting the objectives of the Climate Convention.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio - Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Analysis & Opinions - The New York Times
U.S. Diplomats and Spies Battle Trump Administration Over Suspected Attacks
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


