Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
Mexico Isn't Taking Trump's Threats That Seriously Anymore
I am returning from spending a day in Mexico City speaking with business and government leaders. Relative to my last visit to Mexico, in March, leaders have moved from being appalled and alarmed by the Trump administration to being appalled and bemused.
I suppose this is a kind of progress for the United States, if not for President Trump. It’s not that they find his rhetoric any more rational than they did a few months ago. But they have come to understand that because of the strength of American institutions and the ineptitude of the president, there is likely to be less connection between presidential rhetoric and action than they had previously supposed.
Thus, they commented on the fact that the peso and the Mexican stock market had been unaffected by presidential bluster in Phoenix about building walls and terminating the North American Free Trade Agreement, noting that this kind of rhetoric six months ago would have had major market effects. Similarly, relative to a few months ago, I was asked much less about excessive presidential power or risks to democracy and much more about impeachment scenarios.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Summers, Lawrence.“Mexico Isn't Taking Trump's Threats That Seriously Anymore.” The Washington Post, August 24, 2017.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Financial Times
Why Don’t All CEOs Quit Trump’s Advisory Councils?
Analysis & Opinions
- The Washington Post
The Fed's Job is About to Become Much Harder
Analysis & Opinions
- Financial Times
Donald Trump's alarming G20 performance
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
I am returning from spending a day in Mexico City speaking with business and government leaders. Relative to my last visit to Mexico, in March, leaders have moved from being appalled and alarmed by the Trump administration to being appalled and bemused.
I suppose this is a kind of progress for the United States, if not for President Trump. It’s not that they find his rhetoric any more rational than they did a few months ago. But they have come to understand that because of the strength of American institutions and the ineptitude of the president, there is likely to be less connection between presidential rhetoric and action than they had previously supposed.
Thus, they commented on the fact that the peso and the Mexican stock market had been unaffected by presidential bluster in Phoenix about building walls and terminating the North American Free Trade Agreement, noting that this kind of rhetoric six months ago would have had major market effects. Similarly, relative to a few months ago, I was asked much less about excessive presidential power or risks to democracy and much more about impeachment scenarios.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Financial Times
Why Don’t All CEOs Quit Trump’s Advisory Councils?
Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
The Fed's Job is About to Become Much Harder
Analysis & Opinions - Financial Times
Donald Trump's alarming G20 performance
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


