Journal Article
- PLoS ONE
Authors:
- Laura Diaz Anadon
- William J. Sutherland
- Laura Bellingan
- Jim R. Bellingham
- Jason J. Blackstock
- Robert M. Bloomfield
- Michael Bravo
- Victoria M. Cadman
- David D. Cleevely
- Andy Clements
- Anthony S. Cohen
- David R. Cope
- Arthur A. Daemmrich
- Cristina Devecchi
- Simon Denegri
- Robert Doubleday
- Nicholas R. Dusic
- Robert J. Evans
- Wai Y. Feng
- H. Charles J. Godfray
- Paul Harris
- Sue E. Hartley
- Alison J. Hester
- John Holmes
- Alan Hughes
- Mike Hulme
- Colin Irwin
- Richard C. Jennings
- Gary S. Kass
- Peter Littlejohns
- Theresa M. Marteau
- Glenn McKee
- Erik P. Millstone
- William J. Nuttall
- Susan Owens
- Miles M. Parker
- Sarah Pearson
- Judith Petts
- Richard Ploszek
- Andrew S. Pullin
- Graeme Reid
- Keith S. Richards
- John G. Robinson
- Louise Shaxson
- Leonor Sierra
- Beck G. Smith
- David J. Spiegelhalter
- Jack Stilgoe
- Andy Stirling
- Christopher P. Tyler
- David E. Winickoff
- Ron L. Zimmern
| March 2012
The need for policymakers to understand science and for scientists to understand policy processes is widely recognized. However, the science-policy relationship is sometimes difficult and occasionally dysfunctional; it is also increasingly visible, because it must deal with contentious issues, or itself becomes a matter of public controversy, or both. Laura Diaz Anadon and her coauthors suggest that identifying key unanswered questions on the relationship between science and policy will catalyse and focus research in this field.