Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Kashmir in the AfPak Equation
"When Kashmir is discussed in the strategic discourse these days, it is usually in the context of the broader stabilization effort in the region. Reducing tensions between India and Pakistan would improve Pakistani cooperation in Afghanistan and thus advance US interests. But Kashmir itself is curiously absent from many of these discussions — the assumption seems to be that between them Delhi and Islamabad control the Kashmir Valley, and once the governments agree on the high politics, Kashmiris will fall into line.
Lydia Polgreen's Sunday New York Times article and Kashmir's recent history instead clearly show that, for better and worse, Kashmiris have the capacity to surprise everyone, even Indian and Pakistani intelligence agencies. Though violence has substantially dropped since 2003, the last two years have been in many respects the most dramatic since the insurgency began in 1988...."
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Staniland, Paul.“Kashmir in the AfPak Equation.” Foreign Policy, August 18, 2009.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Lebanese Center for Policy Studies
The Twin Crises and the Prospects for Political Sectarianism in Lebanon
Magazine Article
- The Diplomat
Sheena Greitens on Understanding China’s Policies in Xinjiang
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Counterterrorism and Preventive Repression: China’s Changing Strategy in Xinjiang
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
"When Kashmir is discussed in the strategic discourse these days, it is usually in the context of the broader stabilization effort in the region. Reducing tensions between India and Pakistan would improve Pakistani cooperation in Afghanistan and thus advance US interests. But Kashmir itself is curiously absent from many of these discussions — the assumption seems to be that between them Delhi and Islamabad control the Kashmir Valley, and once the governments agree on the high politics, Kashmiris will fall into line.
Lydia Polgreen's Sunday New York Times article and Kashmir's recent history instead clearly show that, for better and worse, Kashmiris have the capacity to surprise everyone, even Indian and Pakistani intelligence agencies. Though violence has substantially dropped since 2003, the last two years have been in many respects the most dramatic since the insurgency began in 1988...."
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Lebanese Center for Policy Studies
The Twin Crises and the Prospects for Political Sectarianism in Lebanon
Magazine Article - The Diplomat
Sheena Greitens on Understanding China’s Policies in Xinjiang
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Counterterrorism and Preventive Repression: China’s Changing Strategy in Xinjiang
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


