Analysis & Opinions - Christian Science Monitor

Moral Dilemmas and Nuclear Strategy

Can nuclear strategy and morality be compatible? The Roman Catholic bishops of the United States have just addressed this question in their draft pastoral letter. Three important moral dilemmas are raised.

First, can initiating the use of nuclear weapons ever be morally justified? The dilemma arises because it is not known whether, in a conventional war, the use of nuclear weapons in an extremely limited fashion - to destroy a Soviet radar site, for example - would be more likely to lead to nuclear escalation or to stop the conventional war. If initiating the use of nuclear weapons led to escalation, the action would have been immoral. But if it led to a quick end of the conventional war in Europe, might not the action be seen as moral? Perhaps. But every effort would have to be made to keep close control of the risks: Small weapons would be needed; there should be no delegation of authority to dispersed military units; continual communications with the Soviet Union must be maintained; and there should be a clear idea of how to terminate the conflict.

For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation: Doty, Paul, and Albert Carnesale, Stanley Hoffman, Samuel Huntington, Joseph S. Nye, Scott Sagan.“Moral Dilemmas and Nuclear Strategy.” Christian Science Monitor, April 13, 1983.

The Authors

Joseph S. Nye, Jr.

Scott Sagan