Analysis & Opinions - The Huffington Post
Original Sin and the American Constitution
The late French historian, François Furet, observed that Americans regard their Constitution as a "Sacred Arch." Unquestionably, the Constitution is the major rallying point for this country of diverse populations and a relatively short history.
In The New York Times of 9 June, Adam Clymer wrote of two groundbreaking speeches by John F. Kennedy on successive days, 10 and 11 June 1963. The first dealt with upcoming negotiations with the USSR and the second with civil rights in the U.S. On the second speech, Clymer wrote:
"We are confronted primarily with a moral issue. It is as old as the Scriptures and is as clear as the American Constitution," Kennedy said. "The heart of the question is whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities, whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to be treated."
But the original Constitution contained very different language which took nearly a hundred years and a Civil War to amend. Call it, if you will, the original sin of the American Constitution. According to Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, "Representatives...shall be apportioned among the several States...according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of Free Persons...three-fifths of all other persons."
The Fourteenth Amendment, following the Civil War, eliminated the above language and substituted the following: "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state..."
What the original Constitution did was to implicitly recognize slavery and to put down in black and white for history what was part of the genesis of the American republic. In addition, it negated the assertion in the Declaration of Independence that "all men are created equal." And last but not least, it gave the impression that a black man was worth three-fifths of a white man. (Indians were not part of the counting and were not taxed).
Part of the reasoning behind this unfortunate "three-fifths" formula was that it was a sweetener for the southern states to enter the Union. By thus swelling the numbers in counting their representatives, the South was able to establish a political ascendancy that lasted until the Civil War.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Cogan, Dr. Charles G..“Original Sin and the American Constitution.” The Huffington Post, June 10, 2013.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio
- Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Newspaper Article
- Harvard Crimson
HKS Prof. Aldy Talks Clean Energy, Economic Policy at Belfer Center Webinar
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
The late French historian, François Furet, observed that Americans regard their Constitution as a "Sacred Arch." Unquestionably, the Constitution is the major rallying point for this country of diverse populations and a relatively short history.
In The New York Times of 9 June, Adam Clymer wrote of two groundbreaking speeches by John F. Kennedy on successive days, 10 and 11 June 1963. The first dealt with upcoming negotiations with the USSR and the second with civil rights in the U.S. On the second speech, Clymer wrote:
"We are confronted primarily with a moral issue. It is as old as the Scriptures and is as clear as the American Constitution," Kennedy said. "The heart of the question is whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities, whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to be treated."
But the original Constitution contained very different language which took nearly a hundred years and a Civil War to amend. Call it, if you will, the original sin of the American Constitution. According to Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, "Representatives...shall be apportioned among the several States...according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of Free Persons...three-fifths of all other persons."
The Fourteenth Amendment, following the Civil War, eliminated the above language and substituted the following: "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state..."
What the original Constitution did was to implicitly recognize slavery and to put down in black and white for history what was part of the genesis of the American republic. In addition, it negated the assertion in the Declaration of Independence that "all men are created equal." And last but not least, it gave the impression that a black man was worth three-fifths of a white man. (Indians were not part of the counting and were not taxed).
Part of the reasoning behind this unfortunate "three-fifths" formula was that it was a sweetener for the southern states to enter the Union. By thus swelling the numbers in counting their representatives, the South was able to establish a political ascendancy that lasted until the Civil War.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio - Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Newspaper Article - Harvard Crimson
HKS Prof. Aldy Talks Clean Energy, Economic Policy at Belfer Center Webinar
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


