Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
Some Creative Ways to Deal with North Korea
The Trump administration often talks about North Korea policy as if it’s an on-off switch.
President Trump thundered Tuesday that the United States would “totally destroy” North Korea to defend itself and its allies. But Defense Secretary Jim Mattis blandly insisted the next day that it “is still a diplomatically led effort.”
Somewhere in this maze of public statements — including Thursday’s announcement of new economic sanctions on North Korea — there’s a nuanced American policy. But the seeming binary options are weirdly reminiscent of the nuclear standoff of the Cold War, when the only choices seemed to be a conflict with massive loss of life — or surrender to the adversary’s demands.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Ignatius, David.“Some Creative Ways to Deal with North Korea.” The Washington Post, September 21, 2017.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The Washington Post
The Most Surprising Thing About Trump’s U.N. Speech
Analysis & Opinions
- The Washington Post
The Right Question to Ask About the Iran Nuclear Deal
Analysis & Opinions
- The Washington Post
Bring Back the Ombudsman
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
The Trump administration often talks about North Korea policy as if it’s an on-off switch.
President Trump thundered Tuesday that the United States would “totally destroy” North Korea to defend itself and its allies. But Defense Secretary Jim Mattis blandly insisted the next day that it “is still a diplomatically led effort.”
Somewhere in this maze of public statements — including Thursday’s announcement of new economic sanctions on North Korea — there’s a nuanced American policy. But the seeming binary options are weirdly reminiscent of the nuclear standoff of the Cold War, when the only choices seemed to be a conflict with massive loss of life — or surrender to the adversary’s demands.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
The Most Surprising Thing About Trump’s U.N. Speech
Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
The Right Question to Ask About the Iran Nuclear Deal
Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
Bring Back the Ombudsman
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


