Analysis & Opinions - Salon.com
America Needs Realists, not William Kristol
If the New York Times wants true diversity on its Op-Ed pages, it should hire foreign policy realists, not ideologues.
"...a realist would be a valuable antidote to the self-righteous hubris that pervades contemporary U.S. commentary on foreign affairs, an attitude that has encouraged many of the policies that have undermined America's image around the globe. A realist would also cast a skeptical eye on virtually all of the current presidential candidates, whose views on foreign policy do not stray far from the current neoconservative/liberal consensus. Realists aren't infallible and some readers will undoubtedly object to their views, but that's hardly the issue. The point is that Americans would be better informed if they regularly heard what realists had to say, and media institutions that are genuinely interested in presenting a diverse array of views should be signing up a few of them."
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Walt, Stephen M..“America Needs Realists, not William Kristol.” Salon.com, January 18, 2008.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation
50 Years Later, The Legacy of The Paris Peace Accords Isn't One of Peace
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Journal Article
- Contemporary Security Policy
Coercive Disclosure: The Weaponization of Public Intelligence Revelation in International Relations
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ideal Qualities of a Successful Diplomat
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Great Economic Rivalry: China vs the U.S.
If the New York Times wants true diversity on its Op-Ed pages, it should hire foreign policy realists, not ideologues.
"...a realist would be a valuable antidote to the self-righteous hubris that pervades contemporary U.S. commentary on foreign affairs, an attitude that has encouraged many of the policies that have undermined America's image around the globe. A realist would also cast a skeptical eye on virtually all of the current presidential candidates, whose views on foreign policy do not stray far from the current neoconservative/liberal consensus. Realists aren't infallible and some readers will undoubtedly object to their views, but that's hardly the issue. The point is that Americans would be better informed if they regularly heard what realists had to say, and media institutions that are genuinely interested in presenting a diverse array of views should be signing up a few of them."
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation
50 Years Later, The Legacy of The Paris Peace Accords Isn't One of Peace
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Journal Article - Contemporary Security Policy
Coercive Disclosure: The Weaponization of Public Intelligence Revelation in International Relations
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ideal Qualities of a Successful Diplomat
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Great Economic Rivalry: China vs the U.S.