Analysis & Opinions - War on the Rocks
Can Intelligence Tell How Far Putin Will Go?
In a press conference at the end of last week, U.S. President Joe Biden said he was "convinced" that Russian President Vladimir Putin had decided to invade Ukraine. Asked why, he said simply: "We have a significant intelligence capability."
Understanding the intentions of a foreign autocratic leader, particularly one shielded from the outside world and reliant on a small group of trusted advisors, is the Holy Grail for any intelligence service. America's spies, and their British colleagues, appear to have succeeded in that quest. We in the public are unlikely to know how until the relevant documents are declassified decades from now. But history can offer some hints about how Biden knows what he knows and why he has chosen to disclose some of this information publicly.
Cold War archives show that accurate warnings about an adversary's intentions and capabilities were seldom, if ever, the result of a single kind of intelligence. Rather, they were invariably achieved through combinations of intelligence from human and technical sources. Today, open-source intelligence is also playing an increasingly important role. The specific mix of intelligence sources can influence what information a government publicly shares. As demonstrated during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, presidents can best deploy intelligence in their diplomacy when the risk of burning sources is low....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via War on the Rocks.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Walton, Calder."Can Intelligence Tell How Far Putin Will Go?" War on the Rocks, February 28, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
False-Flag Invasions Are a Russian Specialty
Analysis & Opinions
- The Washington Post
The Deadly Fallout of Disinformation
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
In the Eye of the Beholder: How Leaders and Intelligence Communities Assess the Intentions of Adversaries
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
In a press conference at the end of last week, U.S. President Joe Biden said he was "convinced" that Russian President Vladimir Putin had decided to invade Ukraine. Asked why, he said simply: "We have a significant intelligence capability."
Understanding the intentions of a foreign autocratic leader, particularly one shielded from the outside world and reliant on a small group of trusted advisors, is the Holy Grail for any intelligence service. America's spies, and their British colleagues, appear to have succeeded in that quest. We in the public are unlikely to know how until the relevant documents are declassified decades from now. But history can offer some hints about how Biden knows what he knows and why he has chosen to disclose some of this information publicly.
Cold War archives show that accurate warnings about an adversary's intentions and capabilities were seldom, if ever, the result of a single kind of intelligence. Rather, they were invariably achieved through combinations of intelligence from human and technical sources. Today, open-source intelligence is also playing an increasingly important role. The specific mix of intelligence sources can influence what information a government publicly shares. As demonstrated during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, presidents can best deploy intelligence in their diplomacy when the risk of burning sources is low....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via War on the Rocks.Walton, Calder."Can Intelligence Tell How Far Putin Will Go?" War on the Rocks, February 28, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
False-Flag Invasions Are a Russian Specialty
Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
The Deadly Fallout of Disinformation
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
In the Eye of the Beholder: How Leaders and Intelligence Communities Assess the Intentions of Adversaries
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War