Analysis & Opinions - The New York Times
With China, a "Cold War" Analogy Is Lazy and Dangerous
A new idea is gaining currency among some politicians and policymakers in Washington: The United States is in a "Cold War" with China. It's a bad idea — bad on history, bad on politics, bad for our future.
The Biden administration has wisely pushed back on the framing. But the president's actions suggest that his strategy for dealing with China may indeed suffer from Cold War thinking, which locks our minds into the traditional two-dimensional chess model.
Competition with China, though, is a three-dimensional game. And if we continue to play two-dimensional chess, we will lose.
While neither the conflict with the Soviet Union nor the current competition with China has led to all-out combat, the games are very different. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union was a direct military and ideological threat to the United States. We had almost no economic or social connections: Containment was a feasible objective....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via New York Times.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Nye, Joseph S. Jr.“With China, a "Cold War" Analogy Is Lazy and Dangerous.” The New York Times, November 2, 2021.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The United States Needs to Get Serious
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Will Europe Ever Really Confront China?
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The AUKUS Dominoes Are Just Starting to Fall
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Vaccination Crucial in This Year's Respiratory Season
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky
A new idea is gaining currency among some politicians and policymakers in Washington: The United States is in a "Cold War" with China. It's a bad idea — bad on history, bad on politics, bad for our future.
The Biden administration has wisely pushed back on the framing. But the president's actions suggest that his strategy for dealing with China may indeed suffer from Cold War thinking, which locks our minds into the traditional two-dimensional chess model.
Competition with China, though, is a three-dimensional game. And if we continue to play two-dimensional chess, we will lose.
While neither the conflict with the Soviet Union nor the current competition with China has led to all-out combat, the games are very different. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union was a direct military and ideological threat to the United States. We had almost no economic or social connections: Containment was a feasible objective....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via New York Times.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The United States Needs to Get Serious
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Will Europe Ever Really Confront China?
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The AUKUS Dominoes Are Just Starting to Fall
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Vaccination Crucial in This Year's Respiratory Season
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky