Reports & Papers
from Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School

G8 Global Report Card on Preventing Nuclear Terrorism

I.       No Loose Nukes: B

A.     US-Russian Nunn-Lugar Comprehensive Threat Reduction: B+

-        Pursuant to Bratislava, assignment of responsibility to Bodman-Kiriyenko; increased rate of comprehensive upgrades (now covering 54% of FSU materials); on track to meet completion target of 2008.

-        More security and accounting upgrades of buildings with nuclear material finished in 2005 than in any other year.

-        US-Russian agreement to extend CTR agreement for another 7 years.

-        Civil nuclear agreement (assuming announcement on July 14).

-        US removal of 70% of a bombs worth of HEU from Czech Republic.

-        US-Russian removal of 3 bombs worth of HEU from Uzbekistan.

-        Nuclear Threat Initiative’s blending down of 20 bombs worth of uranium from Kazakhstan.

-        Required but undone: Sustained personal presidential priority; assured nuclear security to a global “gold standard;” accelerated global cleanout of HEU from research reactors; leadership in launching global Alliance Against Nuclear Terrorism.

B.     Other G8: D

-         Of $20 billion announced at Kananaskis G8 meeting in 2002, $17 billion pledged, $3.5 billion expended; some progress on legal frameworks including Russian liability issue; misplaced focus on actions with minimal impact on nuclear danger.

-        Required but undone: Focus and accelerate action on highest-priority dangers.

II.    No New Nascent Nukes: C-

A.     US-Russian cooperation: C-

-        Guaranteed nuclear fuel bargain

·        Russian proposal to establish international spent fuel centers.

·        US proposal of a Global Nuclear Energy Partnership.

·        Bodman pledge of 17 tons of uranium for nuclear fuel reserve.

·        IAEA proposal to become guaranteed supplier of last resort.

·        G8 announcement possible.

-        Iran

·        US in the game; plausible coordinated US-Russia-EU offer in bargaining with Iran; upcoming move to SC and sanctions

B.     Other G8: as above

-        Required but undone: Close NPT loophole that permits signatories to develop nuclear fuel production capabilities.

III. No New Nuclear Weapons States: D-

A.     US-Russia plus Six Party Talk members China, Japan, South Korea, DPRK

-        Six Party joint statement in September: North Korean commitment to “abandoning all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs.”

-        Expansion of North Korean arsenal by 2 bombs worth of plutonium; production line making two more bombs worth per year.

-        Pyongyang provocations: nuclear test threats, ballistic missiles sales (18 BM-25s to Iran late last year), test of the long-range Taepodong II, ongoing covert HEU program.

-        No progress since September’s joint statement.

·        Deepening disagreements on approach among parties.

·        Continued payments to Pyongyang by China and South Korea.

·        Current US approach: a striking failure. Staying the course will produce more of the same.

B.     Other G8

-        G8 Gleneagles statement: “We call on North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons-related programs.”

IV.  Nonproliferation Regime: D-

A.     US-Russia

-        Iran and North Korea as above: examples that could collapse regime.

B.     Other G8

-        2004 UN High Level Panel report: "We are approaching a point at which the erosion of the nonproliferation regime could become irreversible and result in a cascade of proliferation."

-        Proliferation Security Initiative, extension of UNSC 1540 Committee.

-        Failure of the 2005 NPT Review Conference; no remedy proposed.

-        “Appalling failure” that excluded mention of nuclear proliferation at UN World Summit in September 2005.

-        Lethargic implementation of UNSC 1540 and global export controls.

-        Failure to learn/apply lessons from the AQ Khan experience. 

Recommended citation

Allison, Graham. “G8 Global Report Card on Preventing Nuclear Terrorism.” Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, July 12, 2006

Up Next