Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Let's Talk About Geoengineering
Negotiations on geoengineering technologies ended in deadlock at the United Nations Environment Assembly in Nairobi, Kenya, last week, when a Swiss-backed proposal to commission an expert UN panel on the subject was withdrawn amid disagreements over language. This is a shame, because the world needs open debate about novel ways to reduce climate risks.
Specifics aside, the impasse stemmed from a dispute within the environmental community about growing scientific interest in solar geoengineering — the possibility of deliberately reflecting a small amount of sunlight back into space to help combat climate change. Some environmental and civil-society groups, convinced that solar geoengineering will be harmful or misused, oppose further research, policy analysis, and debate about the issue. Others, including some large environmental groups, support cautious research....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Keith, David.“Let's Talk About Geoengineering.” Project Syndicate, March 21, 2019.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Governance of the Deployment of Solar Geoengineering
Journal Article
- Environmental Politics
Fast, Cheap, and Imperfect? US Public Opinion about Solar Geoengineering
Journal Article
- Nature Climate Change
Solar Geoengineering Reduces Atmospheric Carbon Burden
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
NATO at Seventy: An Alliance in Crisis
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Negotiations on geoengineering technologies ended in deadlock at the United Nations Environment Assembly in Nairobi, Kenya, last week, when a Swiss-backed proposal to commission an expert UN panel on the subject was withdrawn amid disagreements over language. This is a shame, because the world needs open debate about novel ways to reduce climate risks.
Specifics aside, the impasse stemmed from a dispute within the environmental community about growing scientific interest in solar geoengineering — the possibility of deliberately reflecting a small amount of sunlight back into space to help combat climate change. Some environmental and civil-society groups, convinced that solar geoengineering will be harmful or misused, oppose further research, policy analysis, and debate about the issue. Others, including some large environmental groups, support cautious research....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Governance of the Deployment of Solar Geoengineering
Journal Article - Environmental Politics
Fast, Cheap, and Imperfect? US Public Opinion about Solar Geoengineering
Journal Article - Nature Climate Change
Solar Geoengineering Reduces Atmospheric Carbon Burden
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
NATO at Seventy: An Alliance in Crisis
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology