Analysis & Opinions - Lawfare
The Myth of Consumer Security
The Department of Justice wants access to encrypted consumer devices but promises not to infiltrate business products or affect critical infrastructure. Yet that's not possible, because there is no longer any difference between those categories of devices. Consumer devices are critical infrastructure. They affect national security. And it would be foolish to weaken them, even at the request of law enforcement.
In his keynote address at the International Conference on Cybersecurity, Attorney General William Barr argued that companies should weaken encryption systems to gain access to consumer devices for criminal investigations. Barr repeated a common fallacy about a difference between military-grade encryption and consumer encryption: "After all, we are not talking about protecting the nation's nuclear launch codes. Nor are we necessarily talking about the customized encryption used by large business enterprises to protect their operations. We are talking about consumer products and services such as messaging, smart phones, e-mail, and voice and data applications."
The thing is, that distinction between military and consumer products largely doesn't exist....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Lawfare.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Schneier, Bruce.“The Myth of Consumer Security.” Lawfare, August 26, 2019.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Magazine Article
- Federal Times
How Technologists in Government Could Shape Better Tech Policy
Audio
- Techdirt
Public Interest Tech, With Bruce Schneier
News
- WGBH News
Decrypting Encryption
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
No Exceptions: The Decision to Open All Military Positions to Women
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
NATO at Seventy: An Alliance in Crisis
The Department of Justice wants access to encrypted consumer devices but promises not to infiltrate business products or affect critical infrastructure. Yet that's not possible, because there is no longer any difference between those categories of devices. Consumer devices are critical infrastructure. They affect national security. And it would be foolish to weaken them, even at the request of law enforcement.
In his keynote address at the International Conference on Cybersecurity, Attorney General William Barr argued that companies should weaken encryption systems to gain access to consumer devices for criminal investigations. Barr repeated a common fallacy about a difference between military-grade encryption and consumer encryption: "After all, we are not talking about protecting the nation's nuclear launch codes. Nor are we necessarily talking about the customized encryption used by large business enterprises to protect their operations. We are talking about consumer products and services such as messaging, smart phones, e-mail, and voice and data applications."
The thing is, that distinction between military and consumer products largely doesn't exist....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Lawfare.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Magazine Article - Federal Times
How Technologists in Government Could Shape Better Tech Policy
Audio - Techdirt
Public Interest Tech, With Bruce Schneier
News - WGBH News
Decrypting Encryption
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
No Exceptions: The Decision to Open All Military Positions to Women
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
NATO at Seventy: An Alliance in Crisis