Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Peril of Persuasion in the Big Tech Age
Persuasion is essential to society and democracy, but we need new rules governing how companies can harness it.
Persuasion is as old our species. Both democracy and the market economy depend on it. Politicians persuade citizens to vote for them, or to support different policy positions. Businesses persuade consumers to buy their products or services. We all persuade our friends to accept our choice of restaurant, movie, and so on. It's essential to society; we couldn't get large groups of people to work together without it. But as with many things, technology is fundamentally changing the nature of persuasion. And society needs to adapt its rules of persuasion or suffer the consequences.
Democratic societies, in particular, are in dire need of a frank conversation about the role persuasion plays in them and how technologies are enabling powerful interests to target audiences. In a society where public opinion is a ruling force, there is always a risk of it being mobilized for ill purposes—such as provoking fear to encourage one group to hate another in a bid to win office, or targeting personal vulnerabilities to push products that might not benefit the consumer.
In this regard, the United States, already extremely polarized, sits on a precipice.
There have long been rules around persuasion. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission enforces laws that claims about products "must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence." Political advertisers must identify themselves in television ads. If someone abuses a position of power to force another person into a contract, undue influence can be argued to nullify that agreement. Yet there is more to persuasion than the truth, transparency, or simply applying pressure....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Foreign Policy.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Schneier, Bruce and Alicia Wanless.“The Peril of Persuasion in the Big Tech Age.” Foreign Policy, December 11, 2020.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The New York Times
What Makes Trump's Subversion Efforts So Alarming? His Collaborators
Analysis & Opinions
- The Atlantic
Bots Are Destroying Political Discourse As We Know It
Magazine Article
- Federal Times
How Technologists in Government Could Shape Better Tech Policy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Politico
'My Mother Told Me Not to Speak Ill of the Dead': Political Experts on Henry Kissinger's Legacy
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Analysis & Opinions
- The Boston Globe
Is Trump Risking the Bedrock Principle of the U.S.-India Partnership?
Persuasion is as old our species. Both democracy and the market economy depend on it. Politicians persuade citizens to vote for them, or to support different policy positions. Businesses persuade consumers to buy their products or services. We all persuade our friends to accept our choice of restaurant, movie, and so on. It's essential to society; we couldn't get large groups of people to work together without it. But as with many things, technology is fundamentally changing the nature of persuasion. And society needs to adapt its rules of persuasion or suffer the consequences.
Democratic societies, in particular, are in dire need of a frank conversation about the role persuasion plays in them and how technologies are enabling powerful interests to target audiences. In a society where public opinion is a ruling force, there is always a risk of it being mobilized for ill purposes—such as provoking fear to encourage one group to hate another in a bid to win office, or targeting personal vulnerabilities to push products that might not benefit the consumer.
In this regard, the United States, already extremely polarized, sits on a precipice.
There have long been rules around persuasion. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission enforces laws that claims about products "must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence." Political advertisers must identify themselves in television ads. If someone abuses a position of power to force another person into a contract, undue influence can be argued to nullify that agreement. Yet there is more to persuasion than the truth, transparency, or simply applying pressure....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Foreign Policy.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The New York Times
What Makes Trump's Subversion Efforts So Alarming? His Collaborators
Analysis & Opinions - The Atlantic
Bots Are Destroying Political Discourse As We Know It
Magazine Article - Federal Times
How Technologists in Government Could Shape Better Tech Policy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Politico
'My Mother Told Me Not to Speak Ill of the Dead': Political Experts on Henry Kissinger's Legacy
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Analysis & Opinions - The Boston Globe
Is Trump Risking the Bedrock Principle of the U.S.-India Partnership?