Analysis & Opinions - China Dialogue
The Reforms Needed for Deep Decarbonisation in China
Institutional reforms are key to China tackling climate change. More are needed to secure a low-carbon future.
In 2020, China accounted for 28% of the world’s carbon emissions, and those emissions are still rising. Nevertheless, it has announced its commitment to reaching net-zero carbon emissions before 2060. Given its enormous coal-dependent infrastructure, large heavy-manufacturing base, and rapid rate of urbanisation, transitioning away from fossil fuels will be very challenging.
There is every sign that China is embracing this challenge in a serious manner. It is the top global producer and user of renewable energy, and top producer of electric vehicles (EVs). It has instituted a carbon trading scheme that covers power generation, a sector which accounts for 40% of the country’s emissions. And it has dramatically improved energy efficiency across multiple sectors. In October 2021, the State Council issued a roadmap for decarbonisation with five guiding principles, dozens of measures, and emission targets for 2025, 2030 and 2060. Yet, just weeks later at COP26, China disappointed some governments by not setting more ambitious near-term emission reduction targets.
This raises several questions: How should a country measure success in meeting the challenges of climate change? Are short-term policies to lower emissions as quickly and as much as possible necessarily the most effective approach right now? What about investments in new technologies, like advanced nuclear energy or green hydrogen, that may play only a small role in the near term, but in the long run may prove to be very important in achieving deeper carbon reduction goals?
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via China Dialogue.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Lee, Henry and Daniel Schrag.“The Reforms Needed for Deep Decarbonisation in China.” China Dialogue, April 7, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Prospects for Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage: Costs, Scale, and Funding
Audio
- Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Previewing COP 28: A Conversation with Nat Keohane
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Event Debrief: Social Cost of Carbon Could be Significantly Underestimated, Says Environmental Economist Frances Moore
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
Modernizing Biosecurity and Biosafety in the U.S.: Key Lessons Learned
Newspaper Article
- The Times of London
Professor Unmasks Russian Spy Who Stole the Secrets of Concorde
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
In 2020, China accounted for 28% of the world’s carbon emissions, and those emissions are still rising. Nevertheless, it has announced its commitment to reaching net-zero carbon emissions before 2060. Given its enormous coal-dependent infrastructure, large heavy-manufacturing base, and rapid rate of urbanisation, transitioning away from fossil fuels will be very challenging.
There is every sign that China is embracing this challenge in a serious manner. It is the top global producer and user of renewable energy, and top producer of electric vehicles (EVs). It has instituted a carbon trading scheme that covers power generation, a sector which accounts for 40% of the country’s emissions. And it has dramatically improved energy efficiency across multiple sectors. In October 2021, the State Council issued a roadmap for decarbonisation with five guiding principles, dozens of measures, and emission targets for 2025, 2030 and 2060. Yet, just weeks later at COP26, China disappointed some governments by not setting more ambitious near-term emission reduction targets.
This raises several questions: How should a country measure success in meeting the challenges of climate change? Are short-term policies to lower emissions as quickly and as much as possible necessarily the most effective approach right now? What about investments in new technologies, like advanced nuclear energy or green hydrogen, that may play only a small role in the near term, but in the long run may prove to be very important in achieving deeper carbon reduction goals?
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via China Dialogue.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Prospects for Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage: Costs, Scale, and Funding
Audio - Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Previewing COP 28: A Conversation with Nat Keohane
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Event Debrief: Social Cost of Carbon Could be Significantly Underestimated, Says Environmental Economist Frances Moore
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
Modernizing Biosecurity and Biosafety in the U.S.: Key Lessons Learned
Newspaper Article - The Times of London
Professor Unmasks Russian Spy Who Stole the Secrets of Concorde
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It