Analysis & Opinions - Science
Support for Climate Policy Researchers
In the past 2 years, the European Union and the United States announced plans to spend $573 and $391 billion, respectively, through 2030 on climate actions1 and passed landmark legislation such as the US Inflation Reduction Act.2 Although unprecedented in size and scope, these combined investments of $964 billion pale in comparison to the more than $4 trillion in global clean energy investment needed annually by 2030 to stay on track for net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.3 To maximize the impact of this public money, efficient policies informed by independent, objective analysis will be needed. Yet scientists who commit to policy-relevant research face unique challenges that must be addressed.
Beyond infrastructure, meeting climate goals requires investing in researchers, many of whom will likely spend their entire careers analyzing clean energy technology and policy rollouts,4 assessing their impacts on society, and advising on needed course corrections. This community must include early-career scholars who are essential to tackling the protracted, multi-decadal challenges posed by climate change. Academia can be the wellspring for this research community, but institutions must recognize the barriers they impose on interdisciplinary, applied, policy-focused research.
[1] “Climate mainstreaming,” European Commission (2021); https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/eu-budget/performance-and-reporting/….
[2] “CBO scores IRA with $238 billion of deficit eduction,” Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (2022); https://www.crfb.org/blogs/cbo-scores-ira-238-billion-deficit-reduction.
[3] International Energy Agency, “Net Zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy system” (2021).
[4] R. Hanna, D. G. Victor, Nature Energy 6, 568 (2021).
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Science.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Hanna, Ryan, Eugenie Dugoua, Alejandro Nuñez-Jimenez, Destenie Nock, Stephanie Arcusa, Sergio Castellanos, Michael Davidson, Morgan Edwards, Clara Galeazzi, Xue Gao, Michelle Graff, Kathleen Kennedy, Eleftheria Kontou, Priyank Lathwal, Mirko Musa, Eric O'Rear, Sivaranjani Seetharaman, Jingjing Zhang and Qianru Zhu.“Support for Climate Policy Researchers.” Science, December 15, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio
- Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Analyzing COP 28: A Conversation with Jonathan Banks
Journal Article
- Arctic Yearbook
What Makes the Arctic and Its Governance Exceptional? Stories of Geopolitics, Environments and Homelands
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Prospects for Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage: Costs, Scale, and Funding
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Nonfatal Casualties and the Changing Costs of War
In the past 2 years, the European Union and the United States announced plans to spend $573 and $391 billion, respectively, through 2030 on climate actions1 and passed landmark legislation such as the US Inflation Reduction Act.2 Although unprecedented in size and scope, these combined investments of $964 billion pale in comparison to the more than $4 trillion in global clean energy investment needed annually by 2030 to stay on track for net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.3 To maximize the impact of this public money, efficient policies informed by independent, objective analysis will be needed. Yet scientists who commit to policy-relevant research face unique challenges that must be addressed.
Beyond infrastructure, meeting climate goals requires investing in researchers, many of whom will likely spend their entire careers analyzing clean energy technology and policy rollouts,4 assessing their impacts on society, and advising on needed course corrections. This community must include early-career scholars who are essential to tackling the protracted, multi-decadal challenges posed by climate change. Academia can be the wellspring for this research community, but institutions must recognize the barriers they impose on interdisciplinary, applied, policy-focused research.
[1] “Climate mainstreaming,” European Commission (2021); https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/eu-budget/performance-and-reporting/….
[2] “CBO scores IRA with $238 billion of deficit eduction,” Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (2022); https://www.crfb.org/blogs/cbo-scores-ira-238-billion-deficit-reduction.
[3] International Energy Agency, “Net Zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy system” (2021).
[4] R. Hanna, D. G. Victor, Nature Energy 6, 568 (2021).
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Science.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio - Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Analyzing COP 28: A Conversation with Jonathan Banks
Journal Article - Arctic Yearbook
What Makes the Arctic and Its Governance Exceptional? Stories of Geopolitics, Environments and Homelands
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Prospects for Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage: Costs, Scale, and Funding
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Nonfatal Casualties and the Changing Costs of War