Analysis & Opinions - The Boston Globe
Trump's Decertification Doesn't Mean the Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal
After President Trump announced the decertification of the nuclear agreement with Iran, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, policy experts have largely focused on the extreme possible outcomes of the move. The debate leaves the impression that the deal is facing its demise. In fact, if the United States sidelines itself during the Trump administration, the other parties to the agreement will probably choose to boost their efforts to compensate, in order to control the damage and maintain the terms of the deal. The silver lining is that, by sticking with the agreement, Iran and other parties can turn this around, move the game slowly but positively forward, and even broaden possibilities for the future. As Congress draws near to the Dec. 12 deadline of its deliberations over next steps, understanding the options and outcomes of its actions can move the pendulum from the extreme to the middle ground, and potentially salvage the agreement.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Rouhi, Mahsa.“Trump's Decertification Doesn't Mean the Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal.” The Boston Globe, December 8, 2017.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The National Interest
Trump Should Avoid Believing the Myths of the JCPOA
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Case Against the Iranian Nuclear Deal Is One Big Lie
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Saudi First
Magazine Article
- Der Tagesspiegel
Background: Ivan Arreguín-Toft
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky
After President Trump announced the decertification of the nuclear agreement with Iran, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, policy experts have largely focused on the extreme possible outcomes of the move. The debate leaves the impression that the deal is facing its demise. In fact, if the United States sidelines itself during the Trump administration, the other parties to the agreement will probably choose to boost their efforts to compensate, in order to control the damage and maintain the terms of the deal. The silver lining is that, by sticking with the agreement, Iran and other parties can turn this around, move the game slowly but positively forward, and even broaden possibilities for the future. As Congress draws near to the Dec. 12 deadline of its deliberations over next steps, understanding the options and outcomes of its actions can move the pendulum from the extreme to the middle ground, and potentially salvage the agreement.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The National Interest
Trump Should Avoid Believing the Myths of the JCPOA
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Case Against the Iranian Nuclear Deal Is One Big Lie
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Saudi First
Magazine Article - Der Tagesspiegel
Background: Ivan Arreguín-Toft
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky