Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Trump’s Transactional Myopia
US President Donald Trump's attacks on unfair Chinese trade and technology policies may have been justified, but his tactics have damaged the alliances and institutions on which the United States depends. Will the short-term gains outweigh the long-term institutional costs?
Trump's defenders claim that his aggressive unilateral approach broke the inertia in the international trade regime and prevented other countries from diluting US power. But Trump's transactional diplomacy is very different from the institutional vision of foreign policy that former US Secretary of State George Shultz once described as patient "gardening."
Ever since World War II, American presidents have tended to support international institutions and sought their extension, whether it be the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty under Lyndon B. Johnson; arms-control agreements under Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter; the Rio agreement on climate change under George H. W. Bush; the World Trade Organization and the Missile Technology Control Regime under Bill Clinton; or the Paris climate agreement under Barack Obama.
It was not until Trump that a US administration became broadly critical of multilateral institutions as a matter of policy....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Project Syndicate.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Nye, Joseph S. Jr.“Trump’s Transactional Myopia.” Project Syndicate, February 4, 2020.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The Boston Globe
The Costs of Trump's Disdain for International Morality
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
How to Tell if You're in a Good Alliance
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
You Can't Defeat Nationalism, So Stop Trying
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Was Henry Kissinger Really a Realist?
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
US President Donald Trump's attacks on unfair Chinese trade and technology policies may have been justified, but his tactics have damaged the alliances and institutions on which the United States depends. Will the short-term gains outweigh the long-term institutional costs?
Trump's defenders claim that his aggressive unilateral approach broke the inertia in the international trade regime and prevented other countries from diluting US power. But Trump's transactional diplomacy is very different from the institutional vision of foreign policy that former US Secretary of State George Shultz once described as patient "gardening."
Ever since World War II, American presidents have tended to support international institutions and sought their extension, whether it be the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty under Lyndon B. Johnson; arms-control agreements under Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter; the Rio agreement on climate change under George H. W. Bush; the World Trade Organization and the Missile Technology Control Regime under Bill Clinton; or the Paris climate agreement under Barack Obama.
It was not until Trump that a US administration became broadly critical of multilateral institutions as a matter of policy....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Project Syndicate.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The Boston Globe
The Costs of Trump's Disdain for International Morality
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
How to Tell if You're in a Good Alliance
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
You Can't Defeat Nationalism, So Stop Trying
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Was Henry Kissinger Really a Realist?
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War