Analysis & Opinions - The Hill
The Unseemly Side of Small Wars
Now that the United States has ended its military presence in Afghanistan on unfavorable terms, one wonders what it takes to win a war like this. The answer is not encouraging, and serves as a reminder that the United States should be picky about when to engage in wars against weaker foes in faraway places, and for how long.
Over the past 20 years, the United States has found itself trying to defeat insurgents, small groups of uniform-optional fighters who use hit-and-run tactics as they work to gather strength until they can overwhelm the state. During the surge in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus and like-minded colleagues laid out a modern version of the "hearts and minds" model — the idea that if the forces fighting insurgents can win over enough of a population with good governance, they can rob the insurgents of a base of support.
As the good governance crowd acknowledges, counterinsurgency unavoidably entails nation-building. They are less clear about how violent the process can be....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via The Hill.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
d'Ambruoso, William L." The Unseemly Side of Small Wars." The Hill, October 17, 2021.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The Washington Post
The U.S. Couldn't Build Afghanistan a Democracy. That Rarely Works.
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Affairs
The Hearts-and-Minds Myth
Book
- Cornell University Press
Bullets Not Ballots: Success in Counterinsurgency Warfare
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky
Analysis & Opinions
- The Sunday Times
China is Using Every Trick for World Domination
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Now that the United States has ended its military presence in Afghanistan on unfavorable terms, one wonders what it takes to win a war like this. The answer is not encouraging, and serves as a reminder that the United States should be picky about when to engage in wars against weaker foes in faraway places, and for how long.
Over the past 20 years, the United States has found itself trying to defeat insurgents, small groups of uniform-optional fighters who use hit-and-run tactics as they work to gather strength until they can overwhelm the state. During the surge in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus and like-minded colleagues laid out a modern version of the "hearts and minds" model — the idea that if the forces fighting insurgents can win over enough of a population with good governance, they can rob the insurgents of a base of support.
As the good governance crowd acknowledges, counterinsurgency unavoidably entails nation-building. They are less clear about how violent the process can be....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via The Hill.d'Ambruoso, William L." The Unseemly Side of Small Wars." The Hill, October 17, 2021.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
The U.S. Couldn't Build Afghanistan a Democracy. That Rarely Works.
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Affairs
The Hearts-and-Minds Myth
Book - Cornell University Press
Bullets Not Ballots: Success in Counterinsurgency Warfare
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky
Analysis & Opinions - The Sunday Times
China is Using Every Trick for World Domination
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It