Analysis & Opinions - Iranian Diplomacy
The U.S. War on Terror after Bin Laden
The United States' wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are unlikely to come to an end, even after the death of Osama Bin Laden. These wars which were initiated and continued based on the sacred and ideological aim of the complete destruction of world terrorism (Al Qaeda) will simultaneously provide the grounds for local and opposing forces to justify their resistance in the form of a sacred ideological war against foreign occupiers. In the case of a bilateral ideological war, with no possible winner, therefore the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which have mostly local and regional roots, will not come to end in the near future.
The U.S. "ideological" and "sacred" war against global terrorism in the Middle East started during the George W. Bush administration and albeit in a different form has continued through the Barak Obama administration. In this war, victory over Western opponents, including terrorist and violent groups, regional warlords, adversarial governments, etc., were considered victories for the international community and a step forward in maintaining so-called global security. Such a feature has raised world public expectations in winning these wars. For instance, by expecting a complete defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the West is hoping to diminish the roots of Al Qaeda terrorism.
The main challenge of the prolongation of the wars in the region is this kind of ideological conceptualization regarding the possibility of victory in the wars which ultimately have no possible winner. The U.S. ideological war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorism has simultaneously provided the grounds for the Taliban to legitimize its war with America and the West as a sacred war and battle against the occupation forces to protect its Islamic extremist ideology thereby recruiting local opposing forces. The growth of extremism in Afghanistan has always had a direct relation to battling foreign intrusion. Al Qaeda and Bin Laden are the result of the battle against the Soviet Union occupation during the 1980s....
Continue reading: http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/en/news/70/bodyView/12639/The.U.S..War.on.Terror.after.Bin.Laden.html
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Barzegar, Kayhan.“The U.S. War on Terror after Bin Laden.” Iranian Diplomacy, May 11, 2011.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio
- The Washington Times
History As It Happens: What if? Kennedy and Vietnam
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Do Policy Schools Still Have a Point?
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Con-Man Realism of Vivek Ramaswamy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- The Sunday Times
China is Using Every Trick for World Domination
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
The United States' wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are unlikely to come to an end, even after the death of Osama Bin Laden. These wars which were initiated and continued based on the sacred and ideological aim of the complete destruction of world terrorism (Al Qaeda) will simultaneously provide the grounds for local and opposing forces to justify their resistance in the form of a sacred ideological war against foreign occupiers. In the case of a bilateral ideological war, with no possible winner, therefore the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which have mostly local and regional roots, will not come to end in the near future.
The U.S. "ideological" and "sacred" war against global terrorism in the Middle East started during the George W. Bush administration and albeit in a different form has continued through the Barak Obama administration. In this war, victory over Western opponents, including terrorist and violent groups, regional warlords, adversarial governments, etc., were considered victories for the international community and a step forward in maintaining so-called global security. Such a feature has raised world public expectations in winning these wars. For instance, by expecting a complete defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the West is hoping to diminish the roots of Al Qaeda terrorism.
The main challenge of the prolongation of the wars in the region is this kind of ideological conceptualization regarding the possibility of victory in the wars which ultimately have no possible winner. The U.S. ideological war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorism has simultaneously provided the grounds for the Taliban to legitimize its war with America and the West as a sacred war and battle against the occupation forces to protect its Islamic extremist ideology thereby recruiting local opposing forces. The growth of extremism in Afghanistan has always had a direct relation to battling foreign intrusion. Al Qaeda and Bin Laden are the result of the battle against the Soviet Union occupation during the 1980s....
Continue reading: http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/en/news/70/bodyView/12639/The.U.S..War.on.Terror.after.Bin.Laden.html
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio - The Washington Times
History As It Happens: What if? Kennedy and Vietnam
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Do Policy Schools Still Have a Point?
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Con-Man Realism of Vivek Ramaswamy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - The Sunday Times
China is Using Every Trick for World Domination
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology