Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Affairs
Was NATO Enlargement a Mistake?
Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts
Overview
Foreign Affairs recently published a number of pieces on NATO, the decision to proceed with its enlargement, and its impact on European and global security. To complement these articles, Foreign Affairs solicited a broad pool of experts for their take. As with previous surveys, dozens of authorities with specialized expertise relevant to the question at hand, together with leading generalists in the field were approached. Participants were asked to state whether they agreed or disagreed with a proposition and to and to rate their confidence level in their opinion.
Three Belfer Center members, Francis J. Gavin, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., and Stephen Walt were among those who gave their opinions.
Francis J. Gavin
DISAGREE, CONFIDENCE LEVEL 8
Giovanni Agnelli Distinguished Professor and Director of the Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University
When assessing a policy, it is important to evaluate plausible counterfactuals. Without NATO expansion, a dangerous power vacuum could have emerged in central Europe, a condition that had been dangerous in the past. Absent membership in NATO, Poland and others might have sought their own nuclear weapons. How might a newly reunified Germany—the focus of concern in the early 1990s—have developed in such circumstances? Critics forget that NATO transformed its mission and structure after 1990 and facilitated considerable reductions in military forces. There is no guarantee that Russia would have been happy with other European security arrangements short of a return of its former empire and spheres of influence. And contrary to predictions, the renewed Russian threat has highlighted NATO's unity and the attractiveness of its collective security capabilities.
Joseph S. Nye, Jr.
DISAGREE, CONFIDENCE LEVEL 7
Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus and former Dean of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government
Stephen Walt
STRONGLY AGREE, CONFIDENCE LEVEL 9
Professor of International Affairs at Harvard University
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Foreign Affairs.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Gavin, Francis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., and Stephen M. Walt. "Was NATO Enlargement a Mistake?" Foreign Affairs, April 19, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Ukraine War Doesn't Change Everything
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Hand European Security Over to the Europeans
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Liberal Illusions Caused the Ukraine Crisis
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
US-China Relations: An Interview with Graham Allison
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Overview
Foreign Affairs recently published a number of pieces on NATO, the decision to proceed with its enlargement, and its impact on European and global security. To complement these articles, Foreign Affairs solicited a broad pool of experts for their take. As with previous surveys, dozens of authorities with specialized expertise relevant to the question at hand, together with leading generalists in the field were approached. Participants were asked to state whether they agreed or disagreed with a proposition and to and to rate their confidence level in their opinion.
Three Belfer Center members, Francis J. Gavin, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., and Stephen Walt were among those who gave their opinions.
Francis J. Gavin
DISAGREE, CONFIDENCE LEVEL 8
Giovanni Agnelli Distinguished Professor and Director of the Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University
When assessing a policy, it is important to evaluate plausible counterfactuals. Without NATO expansion, a dangerous power vacuum could have emerged in central Europe, a condition that had been dangerous in the past. Absent membership in NATO, Poland and others might have sought their own nuclear weapons. How might a newly reunified Germany—the focus of concern in the early 1990s—have developed in such circumstances? Critics forget that NATO transformed its mission and structure after 1990 and facilitated considerable reductions in military forces. There is no guarantee that Russia would have been happy with other European security arrangements short of a return of its former empire and spheres of influence. And contrary to predictions, the renewed Russian threat has highlighted NATO's unity and the attractiveness of its collective security capabilities.
Joseph S. Nye, Jr.
DISAGREE, CONFIDENCE LEVEL 7
Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus and former Dean of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government
Stephen Walt
STRONGLY AGREE, CONFIDENCE LEVEL 9
Professor of International Affairs at Harvard University
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Foreign Affairs.Gavin, Francis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., and Stephen M. Walt. "Was NATO Enlargement a Mistake?" Foreign Affairs, April 19, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Ukraine War Doesn't Change Everything
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Hand European Security Over to the Europeans
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Liberal Illusions Caused the Ukraine Crisis
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
US-China Relations: An Interview with Graham Allison
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War