Analysis & Opinions - Political Violence @ a Glance
What Americans (Really) Believe about Chemical Weapons
The norm against the use of chemical weapons has not had a good decade. The Syrian government has repeatedly used chemical weapons against its own people, and the Russian government has used deadly nerve agents to poison political opponents around the world. But at least the norm is strong in democracies like the United States—right? On the surface, it does appear to be strong. For example, the US Army recently announced that it has almost completed destruction of the United States' chemical weapons stockpile ahead of a September 2023 deadline set by the Chemical Weapons Convention. But public actions like these may mask waning private commitment to the non-use norm.
One of the primary ways to measure the strength of norms among the general public—like norms in support of democracy—is to directly ask people about their attitudes in surveys or polls. The problem with this approach is that sometimes people conceal their true beliefs when asked directly. People are particularly likely to hide opinions that might be embarrassing or unpopular. For instance, sexist and racist Americans often lie about their beliefs on direct-question surveys....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Political Violence @ A Glance.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Schwartz, Joshua A., Jonathan A. Chu, and Christopher L. Blair, "What Americans (Really) Believe about Chemical Weapons." Political Violence @ a Glance, March 2, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
The Two Faces of Opposition to Chemical Weapons: Sincere Versus Insincere Norm-Holders
Journal Article
- Nonproliferation Review
Gas, Norms, and Statistics: The Jury is Still Out
Announcement
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Matthew S. Meselson Honored with the 2019 Future of Life Award for BWC Role
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
US-China Relations: An Interview with Graham Allison
The norm against the use of chemical weapons has not had a good decade. The Syrian government has repeatedly used chemical weapons against its own people, and the Russian government has used deadly nerve agents to poison political opponents around the world. But at least the norm is strong in democracies like the United States—right? On the surface, it does appear to be strong. For example, the US Army recently announced that it has almost completed destruction of the United States' chemical weapons stockpile ahead of a September 2023 deadline set by the Chemical Weapons Convention. But public actions like these may mask waning private commitment to the non-use norm.
One of the primary ways to measure the strength of norms among the general public—like norms in support of democracy—is to directly ask people about their attitudes in surveys or polls. The problem with this approach is that sometimes people conceal their true beliefs when asked directly. People are particularly likely to hide opinions that might be embarrassing or unpopular. For instance, sexist and racist Americans often lie about their beliefs on direct-question surveys....
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Political Violence @ A Glance.Schwartz, Joshua A., Jonathan A. Chu, and Christopher L. Blair, "What Americans (Really) Believe about Chemical Weapons." Political Violence @ a Glance, March 2, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Journal of Conflict Resolution
The Two Faces of Opposition to Chemical Weapons: Sincere Versus Insincere Norm-Holders
Journal Article - Nonproliferation Review
Gas, Norms, and Statistics: The Jury is Still Out
Announcement - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Matthew S. Meselson Honored with the 2019 Future of Life Award for BWC Role
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
US-China Relations: An Interview with Graham Allison