Analysis & Opinions - The Hill

What We Got Wrong about Nuclear Risk Reduction

| May 23, 2022

Existing risk reduction tools are designed to prevent risks associated with misperception or inadvertent escalation. They are not tailored to the type of intentional escalation and risk-taking that Russian President Vladimir Putin has demonstrated with regards to Ukraine. Preventing further escalation and nuclear use will require strengthening deterrence and developing new risk reduction tools.

Want to Read More?

The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
Read Full Article
For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation: Williams, Heather.“What We Got Wrong about Nuclear Risk Reduction.” The Hill, May 23, 2022.

The Author

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
In a podcast interview, environmental economist Nat Keohane said he is optimistic that the COP28 climate conference will result in a commitment to triple renewable energy globally by 2030, slash methane emissions, and more.
In a National Academy of Sciences special feature, William Clark and his co-editors examine how to stimulate and accelerate the structural changes needed in how natural and social resources are mobilized to promote sustainability.
The last time Israel faced a challenge like this was in 1973, writes Amos Yadlin. While at first the Yom Kippur War seemed like a defeat for Israel, in the end Israel came out on top and its victory led to a groundbreaking peace agreement with Egypt.
Most Viewed

Tags