Analysis & Opinions - The Hill

What We Got Wrong about Nuclear Risk Reduction

| May 23, 2022

Existing risk reduction tools are designed to prevent risks associated with misperception or inadvertent escalation. They are not tailored to the type of intentional escalation and risk-taking that Russian President Vladimir Putin has demonstrated with regards to Ukraine. Preventing further escalation and nuclear use will require strengthening deterrence and developing new risk reduction tools.

Want to Read More?

The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
Read Full Article
For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation: Williams, Heather.“What We Got Wrong about Nuclear Risk Reduction.” The Hill, May 23, 2022.

The Author

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
As with lend-lease in WWII, the G7 must give Ukraine the means to win both the military and economic campaigns, writes Robert Zoellick.
Juliette Kayyem says the U.S., Mexico, and Canada must develop a coordinated plan to better manage cross-border disaster response.
Infection risk to the general public is low but increasing as cases continue to stack up in the surrounding community, writes Syra Madad.
Most Viewed

Tags