Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Attack and Conquer? International Anarchy and the Offense-Defense-Deterrence Balance
Overview
Karen Ruth Adams of Louisiana State University lays out the technological causes of offense, defense, and deterrence dominance and assesses the ability of these factors to explain attack and conquest among great powers and nuclear states from 1800 to 1997. According to Adams, “this technological argument is a significant predictor of both conquest and attack.” She discusses the significance of her findings for many issues, including the likelihood of nuclear states attacking and conquering nonnuclear states as well as the spread of nuclear weapons.
For the codebook used in this article, please see the first attachment.
For the data set used in this article, please see the second attachment.
Please note: This data set is in Microsoft Excel format using U.S. settings.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Adams, Karen Ruth. “Attack and Conquer? International Anarchy and the Offense-Defense-Deterrence Balance.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 28. no. 3. (Winter 2003/04) .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Speech
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Russia's Invasion of Ukraine and Its Impact on the Global Nuclear Order
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions
- The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?
Overview
Karen Ruth Adams of Louisiana State University lays out the technological causes of offense, defense, and deterrence dominance and assesses the ability of these factors to explain attack and conquest among great powers and nuclear states from 1800 to 1997. According to Adams, “this technological argument is a significant predictor of both conquest and attack.” She discusses the significance of her findings for many issues, including the likelihood of nuclear states attacking and conquering nonnuclear states as well as the spread of nuclear weapons.
For the codebook used in this article, please see the first attachment.
For the data set used in this article, please see the second attachment.
Please note: This data set is in Microsoft Excel format using U.S. settings.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Speech - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Russia's Invasion of Ukraine and Its Impact on the Global Nuclear Order
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions - The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?