Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Kosovo and the Great Air Power Debate
Overview
In the first of two articles on the 1999 war over Kosovo, Daniel Byman and Matthew Waxman of the RAND Corporation seek to dispel the notion that NATO air attacks alone brought Serbia to the negotiating table. They argue instead that air power worked synergistically with other factors—including the threat of a NATO ground assault, declining Russian support for the Serb cause, and the role of the Kosovo Liberation Army—in ending the conflict. More generally, Byman and Waxman maintain that the current debate over the role of air power as an instrument of coercion is "fundamentally flawed." Noting that the outcome of this debate could have broad policy implications, the authors suggest that instead of asking if air power alone can coerce an adversary to surrender, political and military leaders, as well as theoreticians, should ask: "How can [air power] contribute to successful coercion, and under what circumstances are its contributions most effective?"
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Byman, Daniel A., Matthew C. Waxman. “Kosovo and the Great Air Power Debate.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 24. no. 4. (Spring 2000): 5-38 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- International Security
A “Nuclear Umbrella” for Ukraine? Precedents and Possibilities for Postwar European Security
Journal Article
- International Security
We All Fall Down: The Dismantling of the Warsaw Pact and the End of the Cold War in Eastern Europe
Analysis & Opinions
- The MIT Press Reader
Beyond the “Nuclear Umbrella”: Rethinking European Defense After the Russia-Ukraine War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions
- The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?
Overview
In the first of two articles on the 1999 war over Kosovo, Daniel Byman and Matthew Waxman of the RAND Corporation seek to dispel the notion that NATO air attacks alone brought Serbia to the negotiating table. They argue instead that air power worked synergistically with other factors—including the threat of a NATO ground assault, declining Russian support for the Serb cause, and the role of the Kosovo Liberation Army—in ending the conflict. More generally, Byman and Waxman maintain that the current debate over the role of air power as an instrument of coercion is "fundamentally flawed." Noting that the outcome of this debate could have broad policy implications, the authors suggest that instead of asking if air power alone can coerce an adversary to surrender, political and military leaders, as well as theoreticians, should ask: "How can [air power] contribute to successful coercion, and under what circumstances are its contributions most effective?"
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - International Security
A “Nuclear Umbrella” for Ukraine? Precedents and Possibilities for Postwar European Security
Journal Article - International Security
We All Fall Down: The Dismantling of the Warsaw Pact and the End of the Cold War in Eastern Europe
Analysis & Opinions - The MIT Press Reader
Beyond the “Nuclear Umbrella”: Rethinking European Defense After the Russia-Ukraine War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions - The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?