Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
What Is the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance? Conceptions, Causes, and Assessment
Summary
Does cyberspace favor the offense, as many analysts and policymakers claim? Three factors undermine any cyber offensive advantage, as demonstrated in a cost-benefit analysis of the Stuxnet operation against Iran. First, any measurement of the offense-defense balance must consider a cyber operation’s value as well as its cost to both sides. Second, organizational capabilities play a significant role in determining the balance. Third, offensive advantages decline when attackers target physical infrastructure rather than information networks.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Rebecca Slayton, "What Is the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance? Conceptions, Causes, and Assessment," International Security, Vol. 41, No. 3 (Winter 2016/17), pp. 72–109.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Offensive Cyber Working Group
Subversion over Offense: Why the Practice of Cyber Conflict Looks Nothing Like Its Theory and What This Means for Strategy and Scholarship
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Subversive Trilemma: Why Cyber Operations Fall Short of Expectations
Analysis & Opinions
- The Washington Post
America’s Pandemic Response Doesn’t Bode Well for a Potential Cyberattack
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions
- The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?
Summary
Does cyberspace favor the offense, as many analysts and policymakers claim? Three factors undermine any cyber offensive advantage, as demonstrated in a cost-benefit analysis of the Stuxnet operation against Iran. First, any measurement of the offense-defense balance must consider a cyber operation’s value as well as its cost to both sides. Second, organizational capabilities play a significant role in determining the balance. Third, offensive advantages decline when attackers target physical infrastructure rather than information networks.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.Rebecca Slayton, "What Is the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance? Conceptions, Causes, and Assessment," International Security, Vol. 41, No. 3 (Winter 2016/17), pp. 72–109.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Offensive Cyber Working Group
Subversion over Offense: Why the Practice of Cyber Conflict Looks Nothing Like Its Theory and What This Means for Strategy and Scholarship
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Subversive Trilemma: Why Cyber Operations Fall Short of Expectations
Analysis & Opinions - The Washington Post
America’s Pandemic Response Doesn’t Bode Well for a Potential Cyberattack
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions - The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?