“I use ‘disruptive’ in both its good and bad connotations. Disruptive scientific and technological progress is not to me inherently good or inherently evil. But its arc is for us to shape. Technology’s progress is furthermore in my judgment unstoppable. But it is quite incorrect that it unfolds inexorably according to its own internal logic and the laws of nature.”
This presentation asks why states without nuclear weapons fight opponents with nuclear weapons. The presentation critically examines the claim that states believe opponents will not use nuclear weapons in conflict. It argues instead that two conditions make war more likely. First, when there is a direct threat to core security interests. Second, when the non-nuclear state believes an outside actor can help restrain nuclear use in the upcoming conflict. An examination of three cases—Soviet behavior during the early Cold War, the Chinese decision to enter the Korean War, and the Iraqi decision to resist the United States in 1991—provides support for these claims.
Please join us! Coffee and tea provided. Everyone is welcome, but admittance will be on a first come–first served basis.