To compete and thrive in the 21st century, democracies, and the United States in particular, must develop new national security and economic strategies that address the geopolitics of information. In the 20th century, market capitalist democracies geared infrastructure, energy, trade, and even social policy to protect and advance that era’s key source of power—manufacturing. In this century, democracies must better account for information geopolitics across all dimensions of domestic policy and national strategy.
The increasing pace of technological change has led to unparalleled opportunities for development and advancement of our society, but it has also caused difficulties for government officials seeking to engage productively with technology issues. Regulatory bodies and legislators cannot keep up with the pace of technological innovation, as well as the scale and complexity of these technologies. Current events—including ill-prepared Congressional member questioning of tech leaders and a lack of progress on meaningful tech regulation—have demonstrated the consequential impact of policymakers’ seeming inability to effectively engage with major issues in tech policy. In recent years, Congress has been slow to effectively craft regulation for emerging technologies, evaluate the efficacy of R&D spending, and critically examine government use and adoption of technologies.
This lunch discussion will set aside the numerous proposals of methods to improve Congressional science and technology (S&T) capacity and available resources. Instead, this discussion will focus on the characteristics and qualities needed for effective technology assessment for Congress. Thoughts discussed will support for the Government Accountability Office’s forthcoming report to Congress detailing how it will enhance and expand its science and technology support to Congress, consistent with direction provided by the House Conference Report for the Fiscal Year 2019 Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill.