Discussion Paper - Harvard Kennedy School
Assessing and Addressing Cross-Scale Environmental Risks: Information and Decision Systems for the Management of the High Plains Aquifer
Abstract
Between 1940 and 1995, the High Plains aquifer, a major source of irrigation water underlying eight U.S. states in the semi-arid Great Plains, declined in some areas by as much as 50%. As an environmental and resource management challenge, depletion of the High Plains aquifer exemplifies a class of problems which are characterized by cross-scale interactions - those in which events or phenomena at one level of scale influence phenomena at other levels. Environmental problems of this nature have historically posed unique problems and pitfalls for management, particularly when scales of biogeophysical and human systems are mismatched, or when linkages across scales are ignored by decision makers. This research investigates what kinds of responses to a cross-scale problem - in this case, irrigation-induced depletion of the High Plains aquifer - result in effective management strategies, focusing on how information and decision making systems can be structured to support such management.
In this effort groundwater management regimes are compared in Kansas, Nebraska, and Texas using evidence from approximately 50 interviews at federal, state, and local levels. This study suggests that effective cross-scale management is associated with: 1) coordination of information systems across scale (e.g. when scale-dependent comparative advantages in information production and dissemination are exploited); 2) coordination/orchestration of decision making systems across scale (e.g., when decisions made at one level provide opportunities to, or at least do not constrain, decision makers at another level of scale); 3) integration of information and decision functions (e.g., decision makers working closely with information providers in an iterative and long term process of research agenda setting, model building, and model testing); and 4) addressing linked issues simultaneously (e.g., when one agency has responsibility for addressing numerous linked issues such as water quality and quantity and surface and groundwater.)
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Environment and Natural Resources
For Academic Citation:
Cash, David. “Assessing and Addressing Cross-Scale Environmental Risks: Information and Decision Systems for the Management of the High Plains Aquifer.” Discussion Paper, E-98-17, Harvard Kennedy School, August 31, 1998.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Progress in Energy
Successful Clean Energy Technology Transitions in Emerging Economies: Learning from India, China, and Brazil
Announcement
Announcing the Launch of Climate@HKS
Analysis & Opinions
- Scientific American
The Next Administration Must Get Science and Technology Policy Right
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
Between 1940 and 1995, the High Plains aquifer, a major source of irrigation water underlying eight U.S. states in the semi-arid Great Plains, declined in some areas by as much as 50%. As an environmental and resource management challenge, depletion of the High Plains aquifer exemplifies a class of problems which are characterized by cross-scale interactions - those in which events or phenomena at one level of scale influence phenomena at other levels. Environmental problems of this nature have historically posed unique problems and pitfalls for management, particularly when scales of biogeophysical and human systems are mismatched, or when linkages across scales are ignored by decision makers. This research investigates what kinds of responses to a cross-scale problem - in this case, irrigation-induced depletion of the High Plains aquifer - result in effective management strategies, focusing on how information and decision making systems can be structured to support such management.
In this effort groundwater management regimes are compared in Kansas, Nebraska, and Texas using evidence from approximately 50 interviews at federal, state, and local levels. This study suggests that effective cross-scale management is associated with: 1) coordination of information systems across scale (e.g. when scale-dependent comparative advantages in information production and dissemination are exploited); 2) coordination/orchestration of decision making systems across scale (e.g., when decisions made at one level provide opportunities to, or at least do not constrain, decision makers at another level of scale); 3) integration of information and decision functions (e.g., decision makers working closely with information providers in an iterative and long term process of research agenda setting, model building, and model testing); and 4) addressing linked issues simultaneously (e.g., when one agency has responsibility for addressing numerous linked issues such as water quality and quantity and surface and groundwater.)
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Progress in Energy
Successful Clean Energy Technology Transitions in Emerging Economies: Learning from India, China, and Brazil
Announcement
Announcing the Launch of Climate@HKS
Analysis & Opinions - Scientific American
The Next Administration Must Get Science and Technology Policy Right
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


