Paper
Lebanon in the Syria Quagmire
The purpose of this paper is to examine the weaknesses and strengths of Lebanon amidst the tensions created by the Syrian conflict that started in 2011. Lebanon’s sectarian governance system has been over 150 years in the making. But the Syrian fire next door, which has taken an increasing sectarian nature, is likely to burn for a long time. With such dire prospects, what is the fate of Lebanon’s governance system? Will it lead the country inexorably towards civil strife?
The Lebanese governance system could be described as a horizontal deal among communal oligarchs, supported by vertical organizations within each community. While oligarchs have changed over time, the system itself survived devastating civil wars, endured extensive global and regional influences, and was also undeterred by the projection of power by many external forces, including the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Syria, Iran and Israel. What are the forces at work that make the Lebanese governance system both resilient and resistant to change?
In the paper, we use as an analytical framework, which is introduced in section one, the model of limited orders developed by Douglas North and his associates. In section two, we argue that the Syrian civil war is likely to be long lasting. Section three examines the weaknesses and fault-lines of the Lebanese system in light of the Syrian war. Section four explores the factors that continue to contribute to the strength and resilience of Lebanon in spite of the rise in extremist Islamic militancy. The last section presents three potential scenarios for Lebanon - a worst-case scenario in the form of an Iraqization of Lebanon; a conflict management and uneasy coalition of oligarchs scenario, and optimistically, the possible emergence of a citizen based model.
Download the full paper here:
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Middle East Initiative
For Academic Citation:
Diwan, Ishac and Chaitani, Youssef.. “Lebanon in the Syria Quagmire.” Paper, February 2015.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Saudi Arabia’s Nuclear Program: Separating Real Concerns from Threat Inflation
Analysis & Opinions
- CNN
Nicholas Burns on CNN: Israel Signs Diplomatic Deals with UAE, Bahrain
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Sadat and the Road to Jerusalem: Bold Gestures and Risk Acceptance in the Search for Peace
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership
The purpose of this paper is to examine the weaknesses and strengths of Lebanon amidst the tensions created by the Syrian conflict that started in 2011. Lebanon’s sectarian governance system has been over 150 years in the making. But the Syrian fire next door, which has taken an increasing sectarian nature, is likely to burn for a long time. With such dire prospects, what is the fate of Lebanon’s governance system? Will it lead the country inexorably towards civil strife?
The Lebanese governance system could be described as a horizontal deal among communal oligarchs, supported by vertical organizations within each community. While oligarchs have changed over time, the system itself survived devastating civil wars, endured extensive global and regional influences, and was also undeterred by the projection of power by many external forces, including the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Syria, Iran and Israel. What are the forces at work that make the Lebanese governance system both resilient and resistant to change?
In the paper, we use as an analytical framework, which is introduced in section one, the model of limited orders developed by Douglas North and his associates. In section two, we argue that the Syrian civil war is likely to be long lasting. Section three examines the weaknesses and fault-lines of the Lebanese system in light of the Syrian war. Section four explores the factors that continue to contribute to the strength and resilience of Lebanon in spite of the rise in extremist Islamic militancy. The last section presents three potential scenarios for Lebanon - a worst-case scenario in the form of an Iraqization of Lebanon; a conflict management and uneasy coalition of oligarchs scenario, and optimistically, the possible emergence of a citizen based model.
Download the full paper here:
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Saudi Arabia’s Nuclear Program: Separating Real Concerns from Threat Inflation
Analysis & Opinions - CNN
Nicholas Burns on CNN: Israel Signs Diplomatic Deals with UAE, Bahrain
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Sadat and the Road to Jerusalem: Bold Gestures and Risk Acceptance in the Search for Peace
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership


